Tuesday, October 7, 2008
The General Assembly is not in session.

Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.

Search 2008 Bills:

HJ32: Campaign Finance Disclosure Act; Board of Elections to continue its review thereof.

HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 32
Offered January 11, 2006
Prefiled January 4, 2006
Encouraging the State Board of Elections to continue its review of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act.
----------
Patron-- Jones, S.C.
----------
Referred to Committee on Privileges and Elections
----------

WHEREAS, the State Board of Elections conducted a review of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act (the Act) during the 2005 interim pursuant to House Joint Resolution 667 (2005) and, with the assistance of a special subcommittee, proposed a revised version of the Act; and

WHEREAS, the Board and subcommittee propose to continue this review to address several complex issues that involve possibly substantive changes in the Act; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, the Senate concurring, That the State Board of Elections be encouraged to continue its review of the Campaign Finance Disclosure Act to address issues that require further evaluation, including registration and reporting requirements for federal committees and out-of-state and multi-state committees, the "express advocacy" standard, and the treatment of certain tax-exempt or similar organizations; and, be it

RESOLVED FURTHER, That the State Board of Elections be encouraged during its review to seek once again the advice of two members of the House Committee on Privileges and Elections and two members of the Senate Committee on Privileges and Elections as may be designated by their respective chairs, one representative each from the Democratic and Republican Parties of Virginia, two treasurers representing political committees that are registered with the State Board, two general registrars, and one or more non-profit groups with an interest in Campaign Finance disclosure in Virginia.

Additional Data

Explanation

This is the actual text of the bill — the legislation itself. Generally this is amending existing law, proposing the addition or removal of words from laws that are already on the books.

Words that are highlighted in yellow are proposed additions, and words that are crossed out in red are proposed removals.

The numbers with the § symbol before them are references to existing laws, and if you click on them they’ll take you to that part of the law on the state's website.