HB176: Court-appointed counsel; court may waive limit on compensation for certain cases.
Chief Patron
Del.
Lacey Putney (I-19)

Lacey Putney
(I-19)
Bedford, VA
Served: 1962–
Progress
 |
Introduced |
 |
Passed Committee |
 |
Passed House |
 |
Passed Senate |
 |
Signed by Governor |
 |
Became Law |
Status
Bill is Dead
View Entire History
- 12/30/2005 Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/06 062423476
- 12/30/2005 Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
- 01/12/2006 Assigned to Courts of Justice sub-committee: Criminal Law
- 01/18/2006 Reported from Courts of Justice (17-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 01/18/2006 Referred to Committee on Appropriations
- 01/27/2006 Assigned App. sub: General Government and Technology (Wardrup)
- 02/08/2006 Reported from Appropriations with amendments (23-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/10/2006 Read first time
- 02/13/2006 Read second time
- 02/13/2006 Committee amendments agreed to
- 02/13/2006 Engrossed by House as amended HB176E
- 02/13/2006 Printed as engrossed 062423476-E
- 02/14/2006 Read third time and passed House (98-Y 0-N 2-A)
- 02/14/2006 VOTE: PASSAGE (98-Y 0-N 2-A) (see vote tally)
- 02/14/2006 Communicated to Senate
- 02/15/2006 Constitutional reading dispensed
- 02/15/2006 Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
- 02/22/2006 Reported from Courts of Justice with amendment (15-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/22/2006 Rereferred to Finance
- 03/01/2006 Continued to 2007 in Finance (15-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
Summary
Criminal procedure; compensation of court-appointed counsel.
Authorizes the court, in cases where court-appointed counsel represents a
defendant on a felony charge that may be punishable for a period of more than
20 years, to provide additional compensation of up to $850 for such counsel
when the time and effort expended, the result obtained, the novelty and
difficulty of the issues, or other circumstances warrant such additional
compensation. View Full Text »
Poll Results
Tags
Bill Text
Comments
I suppose it is better than the present system, but it is still woefully inadequate. Virginia could double its caps on court-appointed fees and STILL be 51st in the nation!
If you read the entire bill, it only provides for waiving caps. It does NOT mention "additional compensation of up to $850..." Where did that come from in the Summary?