Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
HB3137: Health coverage; expedited review of appeals of final adverse decisions.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. That § 38.2-5902 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
§ 38.2-5902. Appeals; impartial health entity.
A. The Bureau of Insurance shall contract with one or more
impartial health entities for the purpose of performing the review of final
adverse decisions. The Commission shall adopt regulations to assure that the
impartial health entity conducting the review has adequate standards,
credentials and experience for such review. The impartial health entity shall
examine the final adverse decision to determine whether the decision is
objective, clinically valid, compatible with established principles of health
care, and appropriate under the terms of the contractual obligations to the
covered person. The impartial health entity shall review the written appeal;
the response of the utilization review entity; any affidavits which either the
covered person, the treating health care provider, or the utilization review
entity may file with the Bureau of Insurance; and such medical records as the
impartial health entity shall deem appropriate. The impartial health entity
shall issue its written recommendation affirming, modifying or reversing the
final adverse decision within thirty 30
working days of the date that the impartial review entity has received from all
parties all documentation and information necessary for it to complete its
review; however, if the regular process for reviewing
a final adverse decision involving treatment
for a patient whose
condition would be terminal without
the treatment, the impartial
health entity shall issue its written recommendation affirming, modifying, or
reversing the final adverse decision no later than one
business day following the receipt by the
impartial health entity of all necessary information. The
Commissioner or his designee, based upon such recommendation, shall issue a
written ruling affirming, modifying or reversing the final adverse decision
within ten 10
working days after his receipt of the recommendation of the impartial review
entity; however, if the regular process for the issuance
of such written ruling will delay the rendering of treatment for a
patient whose condition would be terminal without the treatment,
the Commissioner or his designee shall issue his written ruling
affirming, modifying, or
reversing the final adverse decision no later than one
business day following the receipt of
such recommendation. Such written ruling shall not be construed as
a final finding, order or judgment of the Commission, and shall be exempt from
the application of the Administrative Process Act (§ 2.2-4000 et seq.). The
written ruling of the Commissioner or his designee shall affirm the
recommendations of the impartial health entity unless the Commissioner or his
designee finds in his ruling that the impartial health entity exceeded its
authority or acted arbitrarily or capriciously. The written ruling of the Commissioner
or his designee shall bind the covered person and the utilization review entity
to the extent to which each would have been obligated by a judgment entered in
an action at law or in equity with respect to the issues which the impartial
review entity may examine when reviewing a final adverse decision under this
section. Failure by the utilization review entity to comply with the written
ruling of the Commissioner or his designee within thirty 30
days of the date of such ruling, or within
three days
of an expedited ruling
shall be deemed a knowing and willful violation of this section. The impartial
health entity shall not be affiliated or a subsidiary of, nor owned or
controlled by, a health plan, a trade association of health plans, or a professional
association of health care providers.
B. The Bureau of Insurance shall contract with one or more impartial health entities such as medical peer review organizations and independent utilization review companies which the Bureau of Insurance shall determine to possess the necessary credentials and otherwise be qualified to perform such review. Prior to assigning an appeal to an impartial health entity, the Bureau of Insurance shall verify that the impartial health entity conducting the review of a final adverse decision has no relationship or association with (i) the utilization review entity, or any officer, director or manager of such utilization review entity, (ii) the covered person, (iii) the treating health care provider, or any of its employees or affiliates, (iv) the medical care facility at which the covered service would be provided, or any of its employees or affiliates, or (v) the development or manufacture of the drug, device, procedure or other therapy which is the subject of the final adverse decision. The impartial health entity shall not be a subsidiary of, nor owned or controlled by, a health plan, a trade association of health plans, or a professional association of health care providers.
C. There shall be no liability on the part of and no cause of action shall arise against any officer or employee of an impartial health entity for any actions taken or not taken or statements made by such officer or employee in good faith in the performance of his powers and duties.
D. Any utilization review entity that is required to provide previously denied services as a result of the review by the impartial health entity shall be subject to payment of such fees as the Commissioner, in his sole discretion, shall deem appropriate to cover the costs of the review. All such fees shall be collected by the Bureau of Insurance and paid directly into the state treasury and credited to the fund for the maintenance of the Bureau of Insurance as provided in subsection B of § 38.2-400. Failure by the utilization review entity to remit such fee within thirty days of the date notice of such fee is mailed to the utilization review entity shall be deemed a knowing and willful violation of this section.
Additional Data
Explanation
This is the actual text of the bill — the legislation itself. Generally this is amending existing law, proposing the addition or removal of words from laws that are already on the books.
Words that are highlighted in yellow are
proposed additions, and words that are crossed out in
red are proposed removals.
The numbers with the § symbol before them are references to existing laws, and if you click on them they’ll take you to that part of the law on the state's website.
