Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
HJ708: Eminent domain; JLARC to study current state of law regarding exercise thereof.
WHEREAS, in 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Kelo v. City of New London, 125 S.Ct. 2655 (2005), in which the Court held that, under the United States Constitution, the taking of property through the exercise of eminent domain for the purpose of economic development constituted a public use, even though the property was ultimately to be given to a private entity; and
WHEREAS, there have been numerous bills introduced in the General Assembly made in response to the Kelo decision; and
WHEREAS, no thorough review of the exercise of eminent domain in Virginia, as set forth in Article I, Section 11 of the Virginia Constitution, has been made since Kelo that would allow a conclusion to be drawn concerning whether eminent domain is or is not subject to abuse in Virginia; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED by the House of Delegates, the Senate concurring, That the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission be directed to study the current state of the law regarding the exercise of eminent domain in Virginia.
In conducting its study, the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission shall review the exercise of eminent domain under the laws of the Commonwealth and under the Constitution of Virginia. The Commission shall determine what, if any, amendments or changes to these laws are needed. Consideration should be given to whether the exercise of eminent domain is or may be subject to potential abuses and, if so, what steps need to be taken to prevent such abuses.
All agencies of the Commonwealth shall provide assistance to the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission for this study, upon request.
The Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission shall complete its meetings for the first year by November 30, 2007, and for the second year by November 30, 2008, and the Chairman shall submit to the Division of Legislative Automated Systems an executive summary of its findings and recommendations no later than the first day of the next Regular Session of the General Assembly for each year. Each executive summary shall state whether the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission intends to submit to the General Assembly and the Governor a report of its findings and recommendations for publication as a House or Senate document. The executive summaries and reports shall be submitted as provided in the procedures of the Division of Legislative Automated Systems for the processing of legislative documents and reports and shall be posted on the General Assembly's website.
Additional Data
Explanation
This is the actual text of the bill — the legislation itself. Generally this is amending existing law, proposing the addition or removal of words from laws that are already on the books.
Words that are highlighted in yellow are
proposed additions, and words that are crossed out in
red are proposed removals.
The numbers with the § symbol before them are references to existing laws, and if you click on them they’ll take you to that part of the law on the state's website.
