Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
SB1294: Sentencing proceeding; victim impact testimony and prior convictions may be presented to jury.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. That § 19.2-295.1 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
§ 19.2-295.1. Sentencing proceeding by the jury after conviction.
In cases of trial by jury, upon a finding that the defendant
is guilty of a felony or a Class 1 misdemeanor, or upon a finding in the trial
de novo of an appealed misdemeanor conviction that the defendant is guilty of a
Class 1 misdemeanor, a separate proceeding limited to the ascertainment of
punishment shall be held as soon as practicable before the same jury. At such
proceeding, the Commonwealth shall present any victim impact
testimony pursuant to § 19.2-295.3 and the defendant's prior
criminal convictionshistory, including
prior convictions and the punishments imposed, by certified,
attested or exemplified copies of the record of convictionfinal
order, including adult convictions and juvenile convictions and
adjudications of delinquency. Prior convictions shall include convictions and
adjudications of delinquency under the laws of any state, the District of
Columbia, the United States or its territories. The Commonwealth shall provide
to the defendant fourteen14 days
prior to trial notice of its intention to introduce evidence of copies
of final orders evidencing the defendant's prior criminal history,
including prior convictions and punishments
imposed. Such notice shall include (i) the date of each prior
conviction, (ii) the name and jurisdiction of the court where each prior
conviction was had, and (iii) each offense of which he was
convicted, and (iv) the punishment imposed.
Prior to commencement of the trial, the Commonwealth shall provide to the
defendant photocopies of certified copies of the defendant's prior
criminal convictionsfinal orders
which it intends to introduce at sentencing. After the Commonwealth has
introduced in its case-in-chief such evidence of
prior convictions and/or victim impact testimony, or if
no such evidence is introduced, the defendant may introduce relevant,
admissible evidence related to punishment. Nothing in this section shall
prevent the Commonwealth or the defendant from introducing relevant, admissible
evidence in rebuttal.
If the jury cannot agree on a punishment and if the defendant, the attorney for the Commonwealth, and the court agree, in the manner provided in § 19.2-257, then the court shall fix punishment.
If the sentence imposed pursuant to this section is subsequently set aside or found invalid solely due to an error in the sentencing proceeding, but the finding of guilt is not set aside, the court shall impanel a different jury to ascertain punishment, unless the defendant, the attorney for the Commonwealth and the court agree, in the manner provided in § 19.2-257, that the court shall fix punishment.
Additional Data
Explanation
This is the actual text of the bill — the legislation itself. Generally this is amending existing law, proposing the addition or removal of words from laws that are already on the books.
Words that are highlighted in yellow are
proposed additions, and words that are crossed out in
red are proposed removals.
The numbers with the § symbol before them are references to existing laws, and if you click on them they’ll take you to that part of the law on the state's website.
