Sunday, September 7, 2008
The General Assembly is not in session.

Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.

Search 2008 Bills:

SB1384: Enjoyment of easement; interference thereof.

SENATE BILL NO. 1384
Offered January 18, 2007
A BILL to amend and reenact § 55-50.1 of the Code of Virginia, relating to visual interference with the enjoyment of an easement.
----------
Patron-- Stosch
----------
Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
----------

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1.  That § 55-50.1 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:

§ 55-50.1. Enjoyment of easement.

Unless otherwise provided for in the terms of an easement, the owner of a dominant estate shall not use an easement in a way that is not reasonably consistent with the uses contemplated by the grant of the easement, and the owner of the servient estate shall not engage in an activity or cause to be present any objects upon the burdened land that unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of the easement by the owner of the dominant estate. In the case where the easement provides the owner of the dominant estate with the principal route of ingress and egress to his residence, unreasonable interference shall include the placement of objects or items adjacent to or in the vicinity of the easement that create a visual nuisance. The terms "objects" or "items" as contained in this section shall not include any fence, electric fence, cattle guard, gate, or division fence as defined in §§ 55-298.1 through 55-322. Any violation of this section may be deemed a private nuisance, provided, however, that the remedy for a violation of this section shall not in any manner impair the right to any other relief that may be applicable at law or in equity.

#

Additional Data

Explanation

This is the actual text of the bill — the legislation itself. Generally this is amending existing law, proposing the addition or removal of words from laws that are already on the books.

Words that are highlighted in yellow are proposed additions, and words that are crossed out in red are proposed removals.

The numbers with the § symbol before them are references to existing laws, and if you click on them they’ll take you to that part of the law on the state's website.