Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
SB780: Involuntary temporary detention; issuance and execution of order.
Chief Patron
Sen.
Ken Cuccinelli (R-37)
Ken Cuccinelli
(R-37)
Served: 2002–
Progress
| Introduced | |
| Passed Committee | |
| Passed House | |
| Passed Senate | |
| Signed by Governor | |
| Became Law |
Status
Bill is Dead
Summary
Involuntary temporary detention; issuance and execution of order. Modifies one element of the legal standard for involuntary commitment by changing the requirement that individuals present an "imminent danger" to a requirement that individuals present a "significant risk." Emphasizes criteria required for involuntary commitment as found in prior records of treatment and noncompliance with treatment, and demonstrated in reports of witnesses, family members, physicians, or mental health professionals.
View Full Text »Poll Results
28 votes
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Introduced: October 23, 2006
Status: assigned to subcommittee
: Involuntary commitment hearings; law students may represent petitioner without practicing attorney.Status: assigned to subcommittee
Introduced: January 03, 2007
Status: assigned to subcommittee
: Assisted outpatient treatment; establishes program for severely mentally ill.Status: assigned to subcommittee
Introduced: December 11, 2006
Status: assigned to subcommittee
: Outpatient treatment orders; changes criteria therefor.Status: assigned to subcommittee
Introduced: January 08, 2007
Status: signed by governor
: Admission hearings, involuntary; adds providers to list by which an examiner may be employed.Status: signed by governor
Introduced: January 04, 2007
Status: assigned to subcommittee
: Outpatient treatment orders; changes first criterion to include failure to properly take medication.Status: assigned to subcommittee

Comments
What does "significant" mean? How is is quantified? This language is so vague that many more people than need to be are going to be deprived of their liberty and traumatized by being handcuffed and dragged away in public without committing any crime. Significant could mean anything from a 10% chnace to 100% chance depending on the beliefs and attitude of the person making the decision. Just what we need, MORE inconsistency across the state and even within counties in who gets TDO'd.