HB1390: Higher educational institutions; operational authority therefor in information technology.

HB1390H1
HB1390

HOUSE BILL NO. 1390 AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE (Proposed by the House Committee on Appropriations on February 4, 2008) (Patron Prior to Substitute--Delegate Putney) A BILL to amend and reenact § 23-38.90 of the Code of Virginia, relating to operational authority for public institutions of higher education in information technology, procurement, and capital projects excluding leases of real property.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1. That § 23-38.90 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:

§ 23-38.90. Memoranda of understanding.

A. 1. The Governor shall recommend to the General Assembly an operational area or areas in addition to decentralization programs in finance and capital outlay established as of June 30, 2005, under which public institutions of higher education may seek to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the Commonwealth. In submitting "The Budget Bill" for calendar year 2005 pursuant to subsection A of § 2.2-1509, the Governor shall include eligibility criteria for each operational area along with the functional authority that could be granted in each area. In each operational area, the functional authority granted through a memorandum of understanding shall not exceed the level of autonomy permitted under Subchapter 3 (§ 23-38.91 et seq.) of this chapter.

2. Effective July 1, ~~2006~~ 2008, any public institution of higher education may enter into a memorandum of understanding with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor, for additional operational authority in any operational area or areas adopted by the General Assembly in accordance with ~~subdivision A 1~~ law provided that the authority granted in the memorandum of understanding is consistent with that institution's ability to manage its operations in the particular area or areas and provided that the following general criteria are met:

1. The institution has received and maintained Council certification pursuant to § 23-9.6:1.01 for the most recent year that the Council has completed certification;

2. An absolute two-thirds or more of the institution's governing body shall have voted in the affirmative for a resolution expressing the sense of the body that the institution is qualified to be, and should be, governed by memoranda of understanding as provided in this chapter;

3. The institution must adopt at least one new education-related measure for each area of operational authority for which a memorandum of understanding is requested. Each education-related measure and its respective target shall be developed in consultation with the Secretary of Finance, Secretary of Education, the appropriate Cabinet Secretary, and the Council. Each education-related measure and its respective target must be approved by the Council and shall become part of the certification required by § 23-9.6:1.01.

B. Within 15 days of receipt of a request from a public institution of higher education to enter into a memorandum of understanding ~~pursuant to subsection A~~ as provided herein, the Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries receiving that request shall notify the Chairmen of the House Committee on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on Finance of the request. The Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries shall determine within 90 calendar days whether or not to enter into the requested memorandum of understanding, or some variation thereof. If the determination is to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the institution, the Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries shall forward a copy of the governing body's resolution and a copy of the memorandum of understanding to the Chairmen of the House Committee on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on Finance. Each initial memorandum of understanding shall remain in effect until June 30, 2011. Subsequent memoranda of understanding shall remain in effect for a period of five years. If the determination is not to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the institution, the Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries shall notify the Chairmen of the House Committee on Appropriations and the Senate Committee on Finance of the reasons for denying the institution's request. If an institution's request is denied, nothing in this ~~subsection~~ section shall prohibit the institution from submitting a future request to enter into a memorandum of understanding pursuant to ~~subsection A of~~ this section.

2. § 1.0. Pursuant to § 23-38.90 any public institution of higher education in Virginia may be granted additional operational authority in a minimum of two but not all three of the following functional areas: information technology, as provided in § 2.0 of this Act; procurement, as provided in § 3.0 of this Act; and capital projects excluding leases of real property, as provided in § 4.0 of this Act. However, no public institution of higher education in Virginia shall be allowed additional operational authority in all three functional areas pursuant to this Act. For each functional area of additional operational authority selected by the public institution as permitted under this Act, such institution shall be required to enter into a separate and distinct memorandum of understanding with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor, in order to exercise any such operational authority. As an example, if a public institution of higher education selects information technology and procurement, it shall be required to enter into one memorandum of understanding covering information technology and a separate and distinct memorandum of understanding covering procurement, as a condition of exercising any such additional operational authority in each functional area.

§ 2.0. The following provides the Policy for Information Technology:

I. PREAMBLE.

The Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, provides, inter alia, that "any public institution of higher education may enter into a memorandum of understanding with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor, for additional operational authority in any operational area or areas adopted by the General Assembly in accordance with law provided that the authority granted in the memorandum of understanding is consistent with that Institution's ability to manage its operations in the particular area or areas." See § 23-38.90 of the Code of Virginia.

II. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Information Technology Policy, the following terms have the following meanings, unless the context requires otherwise:

"Board of Visitors" or "Board" means the governing body of any public institution of higher education in Virginia, including the State Board for Community Colleges.

"Enabling legislation" means those chapters, other than Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.), of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, creating, continuing, or otherwise setting forth the powers, purposes, and missions of the individual public institutions of higher education of the Commonwealth.

"Information technology" or "IT" shall have the same meaning as set forth in § 2.2-2006 of the Code of Virginia, as it currently exists and from time to time may be amended.

"Major information technology project" or "major IT project" shall have the same meaning as set forth in § 2.2-2006 of the Code of Virginia, as it currently exists and from time to time may be amended.

"Policy" means this Information Technology Policy adopted by the Board of Visitors.

"President" shall mean the president, superintendent, or chancellor of a public institution of higher education.

"Public institution of higher education" or "Institution" means a two-year or four-year public institution of higher education, or the Virginia Community College System, entering into a memorandum of understanding with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor.

"Restructuring Act" means the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia.

"State Chief Information Officer" or "State CIO" means the Chief Information Officer of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

III. SCOPE OF POLICY.

A. This Policy is intended to cover and implement the authority that may be granted to a public institution of higher education pursuant to Subchapter 2 (§ 23-38.90) of the Restructuring Act. This Policy is not intended to affect any other powers and authorities granted to a public institution of higher education pursuant to the Appropriation Act and the Code of Virginia, including other provisions of the Restructuring Act or the Institution's enabling legislation.

To be eligible for such additional authority as provided in this section, an institution seeking information technology operational authority shall document in any request for a memorandum of understanding in this functional area, the following criteria:

1a. The Institution is a member of the Virginia Association of State Colleges and University Purchasing Professionals (VASCUPP) as of July 1, 2003 and the Institution has implemented at least one of the following major systems in the last decade: a financial system, a human resources system, or a student information system; or

1b. The Institution has successfully implemented at least one of the following major systems in the last five years: a financial system, a human resources system, or a student information system; and

2. The Institution has the Chief Information Officer position reporting to the president or chancellor, or to a position of no more than one level below the president or chancellor;

3. The Institution shall develop and the Board shall adopt an information technology strategic plan and information technology policies, standards, and guidelines governing project management, infrastructure architecture, ongoing operations, and security and project auditing as provided in Part IV of this Policy; and

4. The Institution has at least one project manager on staff that has successfully attained certification as a Project Management Professional from the Project Management Institute and has completed the Commonwealth Overview training, or has passed the Core and Facilitation processes test.

B. This Policy shall govern the Institution's information technology strategic planning, expenditure reporting, budgeting, project management, infrastructure, architecture, ongoing operations, security, and audits conducted within, by, or on behalf of the public institution of higher education. Upon the effective date of any memorandum of understanding entered into with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Cabinet Secretaries, as designated by the Governor, the Institution shall be exempt from those provisions of the Code of Virginia, including those provisions of Chapter 20.1 (§ 2.2-2005 et seq.) (Virginia Information Technologies Agency) and of Article 20 (§ 2.2-2457 et seq.) (Information Technology Investment Board) of Chapter 24 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia, that otherwise would govern the Institution's information technology strategic planning, expenditure reporting, budgeting, project management, infrastructure, architecture, ongoing operations, security, and audits conducted within, by, or on behalf of the Institution; provided however, that the Institution still shall be subject to those provisions of Chapter 20.1 (§ 2.2-2005 et seq.) (Virginia Information Technologies Agency) and of Article 20 (§ 2.2-2457 et seq.) (Information Technology Investment Board) of Chapter 24 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia that are applicable to public institutions of higher education of the Commonwealth and that do not govern information technology strategic planning, expenditure reporting, budgeting, project management, infrastructure, architecture, ongoing operations, security, and audits within, by, or on behalf of the Institution.

C. Specifically with regard to the procurement of information technology and telecommunications goods and services, including automated data processing hardware and software, the institution shall be exempt from the oversight of the Virginia Information Technologies Agency Chapter 20.1 (§ 2.2-2005 et seq.) of Title 2.2, and the Information Technology Investment Board, Article 20 (§ 2.2-2457 et seq.) of Chapter 24 of Title 2.2. The Institution may elect to have all such procurements be governed by either (i) the Virginia Public Procurement Act (§ 2.2-4300 et seq. of the Code of Virginia) or (ii) the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction that are incorporated in § 3.0 of this Act and that pertain to the procurement of information technology and telecommunications goods and services, including automated data processing hardware and software.

IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

A. Board of Visitors Accountability and Delegation of Authority.

B. Strategic Planning.

The President of the Institution, acting through the appropriate designee, shall be responsible for overall IT strategic planning at the Institution, which shall be linked to and in support of the Institution's overall strategic plan. At least 45 days prior to each fiscal year, the President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall make available the Institution's IT strategic plan covering the next fiscal year to the State CIO for his review and comment with regard to the consistency of the Institution's plan with the intent of the currently published overall five-year IT strategic plan for the Commonwealth developed by the State CIO pursuant to § 2.2-2007 of the Code of Virginia and into which the Institution's plan is to be incorporated.

C. Expenditure Reporting and Budgeting.

The President of the Institution, acting through the appropriate designee, shall approve and be responsible for overall IT budgeting and investments at the Institution. The Institution's IT budget and investments shall be linked to and in support of the Institution's IT strategic plan, and shall be consistent with general institution policies, the Board-approved annual operating budget, and other Board approvals for certain procurements. By October 1 of each year, the President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall make available to the State CIO and the Information Technology Investment Board a report on the previous fiscal year's IT expenditures. The Institution shall be specifically exempt from: (i) subdivision A 4 of § 2.2-2007 of the Code of Virginia (review by the State CIO of IT budget requests), as it currently exists and from time to time may be amended; (ii) §§ 2.2-2022 through 2.2-2024 of the Code of Virginia (Virginia Technology Infrastructure Fund), as they currently exist and from time to time may be amended; and (iii) any other substantially similar provision of the Code of Virginia governing IT expenditure reporting and budgeting, as it currently exists and from time to time may be amended.

D. Project Management.

The Board shall adopt the project management policies, standards, and guidelines developed by the Commonwealth or those based upon industry best practices for project management as defined by leading IT consulting firms, leading software development firms, or a nationally-recognized project management association, appropriately tailored to the specific circumstances of the Institution. Copies of the Board's policies, standards, and guidelines shall be made available to the Information Technology Investment Board.

The President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall oversee the management of all of the Institution's IT projects. IT projects may include, but are not limited to, upgrades to network infrastructure, provision of technology to support research, database development, implementation of new applications, and development of IT services for students, faculty, staff, and patients. Day-to-day management of projects shall be the responsibility of appointed project directors and shall be in accord with the project management policies, standards, and guidelines adopted by the Board, as amended and revised from time to time.

On a quarterly basis, the President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall report to the Information Technology Investment Board on the budget, schedule, and overall status of the Institution's major IT projects. This requirement shall not apply to research projects, research initiatives, or instructional programs.

The President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall be responsible for decisions to substantially alter a project's scope, budget, or schedule after initial approval.

The Institution shall be specifically exempt from:

§ 2.2-2008 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia (additional duties of the State CIO relating to project management) as it currently exists and from time to time may be amended;

§§ 2.2-2016 through 2.2-2021 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia (Division of Project Management) as they currently exist and from time to time may be amended; and

Any other substantially similar provision of the Code of Virginia governing IT project management, as it currently exists or from time to time may be amended.

The State CIO and the Information Technology Investment Board shall continue to have the authority regarding project suspension and termination as provided in § 2.2-2015 and in subdivision A 3 of § 2.2-2458, respectively and the State CIO and the Information Technology Investment Board shall continue to provide the Institution with reasonable notice of, and a reasonable opportunity to correct, any identified problems before a project is terminated. Projects in excess of $1,000,000 shall be reviewed by the State CIO and the Information Technology Investment Board. The State CIO and the Information Technology Investment Board within 30 days of such review shall provide a non-binding recommendation to the institution, Governor and General Assembly.

E. Infrastructure, Architecture, Ongoing Operations, and Security.

The Board shall adopt the policies, standards, and guidelines related to IT infrastructure, architecture, ongoing operations, and security developed by the Commonwealth or those of nationally-recognized associations, appropriately tailored to the specific circumstances of the Institution. Copies of the policies shall be made available to the Information Technology Investment Board.

The President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall be responsible for implementing such policies, standards, and guidelines adopted by the Board, as amended and revised from time to time. For purposes of implementing this Policy, the President shall appoint an existing employee of the Institution to serve as a liaison between the Institution and the State CIO.

F. Audits.

The Board shall adopt the policies, standards, and guidelines developed by the Commonwealth or those based upon industry best practices for project auditing as defined by leading IT experts, including consulting firms, or a nationally recognized project auditing association, appropriately tailored to the specific circumstances of the Institution, which provide for the Independent Validation and Verification (IV&V) of the Institution's major IT projects. Copies of the policies, standards, and guidelines, as amended and revised from time to time, shall be made available to the Information Technology Investment Board.

Audits of IT strategic planning, expenditure reporting, budgeting, project management, infrastructure, architecture, ongoing operations, and security, shall also be the responsibility of the Institution's Internal Audit Department and the Auditor of Public Accounts.

§ 3.0. The following provides the Policy for Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction and the Disposition of Surplus Materials:

I. PREAMBLE.

A. The Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, provides, inter alia, that "any public institution of higher education may enter into a memorandum of understanding with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor, for additional operational authority in any operational area or areas adopted by the General Assembly in accordance with law provided that the authority granted in the memorandum of understanding is consistent with the Institution's ability to manage its operations in the particular area or areas." See § 23-38.90 of the Code of Virginia.

B. This Policy is intended to cover the authority that may be granted to a public institution of higher education pursuant to Subchapter 2 (§ 23-38.90) of the Restructuring Act. Any other powers and authorities granted to a public institution of higher education pursuant to any other sections of the Code of Virginia, including other provisions of the Restructuring Act, the Appropriation Act, and the Institution's enabling legislation are not affected by this policy.

II. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Policy, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context requires otherwise:

"Board of Visitors" or "Board" means the governing body of any public institution of higher education in Virginia, including the State Board for Community Colleges.

"Effective date" means the effective date of the memorandum of understanding.

"Goods" means all material, equipment, supplies, and printing, including information technology and telecommunications goods such as automated data processing hardware and software.

"Memorandum of Understanding" means the agreement entered into by a public institution of higher education with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor, for additional operational authority in an operational area.

"President" shall mean the president, superintendent, or chancellor of a public institution of higher education.

"Restructuring Act" means the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia.

"Rules" means the "Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction" attached to this Policy as Attachment 1.

"Services" means any work performed by an independent contractor wherein the service rendered does not consist primarily of acquisition of equipment or materials, or the rental of equipment, materials and supplies, and shall include both professional services, which include the practice of accounting, actuarial services, architecture, land surveying, landscape architecture, law, dentistry, medicine, optometry, and pharmacy, and professional engineering, and nonprofessional services, which include any service not specifically identified as professional services.

"Surplus materials" means personal property including, but not limited to, materials, supplies, equipment and recyclable items, that are determined to be surplus by the Institution.

III. BOARD OF VISITORS ACCOUNTABILITY AND DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY.

The Board of Visitors of a public institution of higher education shall at all times be fully and ultimately accountable for the proper fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities set forth in, and for the appropriate implementation of, this Policy. Consistent with this full and ultimate accountability, however, the Board may, pursuant to its legally permissible procedures, specifically delegate either herein or by separate Board resolution the duties and responsibilities set forth in this Policy to a person or persons within the Institution, who while continuing to be fully accountable for such duties and responsibilities, may further delegate the implementation of those duties and responsibilities pursuant to the Institution's usual delegation policies and procedures. The delegation of authority to the Virginia Community College System under this section shall be to the State Board for Community Colleges, based on qualifications and performance of System Office staff. The State Board for Community Colleges shall be responsible for approving any subsequent delegation of authority to Community College presidents as long as such College meets the eligibility criteria set forth in this section and based on a set of performance criteria established by the State Board for Community Colleges and included in the memorandum of understanding for approval by the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor.

IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

To be eligible for such additional authority provided in this section, an institution seeking procurement operational authority shall document in any request for a memorandum of understanding in this functional area, the following criteria:

1. The Institution has decentralized procurement authority delegated to the institution by the Department of General Services pursuant to Chapter 11 (§ 2.2-1100 et seq.) of Title 2.2. The Virginia Community College System Office must receive decentralized procurement authority delegated by the Department to be eligible for authority under this section. Once such authority is received, the System Office may grant procurement authority under this section to individual community colleges when such colleges have been granted decentralized procurement authority by the Department pursuant to Chapter 11 (§ 2.2-1100 et seq.) of Title 2.2;

2. The Institution is in full compliance with the requirements of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, Chapter 43 (§ 2.2-4300 et seq.) of Title 2.2;

3. The Institution shall adopt the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance and Construction to govern the procurement of goods, services, insurance and construction by the Institution;

4. The Institution's Chief Procurement Officer and lead buyer must have and maintain the Virginia Contracting Officer (VCO) certification and other buyers must achieve the VCO certification within two years of Level II authority being approved or within two years of hiring unless exempted by the Department; and

5. The Institution's SWAM plan has been adopted by the Board and approved and certified by the Secretary of Administration that the Institution is in compliance.

A. Adoption of this Policy and Continued Applicability of Other Board of Visitors' Procurement Policies.

This Policy may be adopted by a Board of Visitors to enable a public institution of higher education to develop a procurement system, as well as a surplus materials disposition system for the Institution as a whole. Any Institution procurement system shall integrate or interface with the Commonwealth's electronic procurement system.

This Policy shall be effective on the effective date of an Institution's memorandum of understanding with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor. The implementing policies and procedures adopted by the President, acting through the appropriate designee, to implement this Policy, shall continue to be subject to any other policies adopted by the Board of Visitors affecting procurements at the Institution, including policies regarding the nature and amounts of procurements that may be undertaken without the approval of the Board of Visitors, or of the President, acting through the appropriate designee.

B. Scope and Purpose of Institution Procurement Policies.

This Policy shall apply to procurements of goods, services, insurance and construction. It shall be the policy of the Institution that procurements conducted by the Institution result in the purchase of high quality goods and services at reasonable prices, and that the Institution be free, to the maximum extent permitted by law and this Policy, from constraining policies that hinder the ability of the Institution to do business in a competitive environment. This Policy, together with the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction attached to this Policy as Attachment 1, shall apply to all procurements undertaken by the Institution, regardless of the source of funds.

C. Collaboration, Communication, and Cooperation with the Commonwealth.

The Institution shall be committed to developing, maintaining, and sustaining collaboration, communication, and cooperation with the Commonwealth regarding the matters addressed in this Policy, particularly with the Offices of the Secretaries of Administration and Technology, the Department of General Services, and the Virginia Information Technologies Agency. Identifying business objectives and goals common to both the Institution and the Commonwealth and the mechanisms by which such objectives and goals may be jointly pursued and achieved are among the desired outcomes of such collaboration, communication, and cooperation.

D. Commitment to Statewide Contracts, Electronic Procurement, and SWAM Participation and Use.

The Institution shall be committed to maximizing its internal operational efficiencies, economies of scale among institutions of higher education, and the leveraged buying power of the Commonwealth as a whole.

Consistent with this commitment, the Institution: (i) may purchase from and participate in all statewide contracts for goods and services, including information technology goods and services, except that the Institution shall purchase from and participate in contracts for communications services and telecommunications facilities entered into by the Virginia Information Technologies Agency pursuant to § 2.2-2011 of the Code of Virginia unless an exception is provided in the Appropriation Act or by other law, and provided that orders not placed through statewide contracts shall be processed directly or by integration or interface through the Commonwealth's electronic procurement system; (ii) shall use directly or by integration or interface the Commonwealth's electronic procurement system and comply with the Department of General Services' Business Plan for the Commonwealth's electronic procurement system; and (iii) shall adopt a small, woman-owned, and minority-owned (SWAM) business program that is consistent with the Commonwealth's SWAM program.

E. Implementation.

To effect its implementation under the Memorandum of Understanding, and if the Institution remains in continued substantial compliance with the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Institution's procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction and the disposition of surplus materials shall be exempt from the Virginia Public Procurement Act, Chapter 43 (§ 2.2-4300 et seq.) of Title 2.2, except § 2.2-4342 and §§ 2.2-4367 through 2.2-4377; the state agency requirements regarding disposition of surplus materials and distribution of proceeds from the sale or recycling of surplus materials in §§ 2.2-1124 and 2.2-1125; the requirement to purchase from the Department for the Blind and Vision Impaired (VIB) (§ 2.2-1117); and any other state statutes, rules, regulations, or requirements relating to the procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction, including but not limited to Article 3 (§ 2.2-1109 et seq.) of Chapter 11 of Title 2.2, regarding the duties, responsibilities, and authority of the Division of Purchases and Supply of the Virginia Department of General Services, and Article 4 (§ 2.2-1129 et seq.) of Chapter 11 of Title 2.2, regarding the review and the oversight by the Division of Engineering and Buildings of the Virginia Department of General Services of contracts for the construction of the Institution's capital projects and construction-related professional services (§ 2.2-1132).

V. INSTITUTION PROCUREMENT POLICIES.

A. General Competitive Principles.

In connection with the Institution procurements and the processes leading to award of contracts for goods, services, insurance, and construction, the Institution shall:

1. Seek competition to the maximum practical degree, taking into account the size of the anticipated procurement, the term of the resulting contract and the likely extent of competition;

2. Conduct all procurements in an open, fair and impartial manner and avoiding any impropriety or the appearance of any impropriety;

3. Make procurement rules clear in advance of any competition;

4. Provide access to the Institution's business to all qualified vendors, firms and contractors, with no potential bidder or offeror excluded arbitrarily or capriciously, while allowing the flexibility to engage in cooperative procurements and to meet special needs of the Institution;

5. Ensure that specifications for purchases are fairly drawn so as not to favor unduly a particular vendor; and

6. Provide for the free exchange of information between the Institution, vendors, firms or contractors concerning the goods or services sought and offered while preserving the confidentiality of proprietary information.

B. Access to Records.

Procurement records shall be available to citizens or to interested persons, firms or corporations in accordance with the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, Chapter 37 (§ 2.2-3700 et seq.) of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia, except those records exempt from disclosure pursuant to § 2.2-3705.1 (7), § 2.2-3705.1 (12), or § 2.2-3705.4 (4), or other applicable exemptions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act, and § 2.2-4342 of the Virginia Public Procurement Act.

C. Cooperative Procurements and Alliances.

In circumstances where the Institution determines and documents that statewide contracts for goods and services, including information technology and telecommunications goods and services, do not provide goods and services to the Institution that meet its business goals and objectives, the Institution is authorized to participate in cooperative procurements with other public or private organizations or entities, including other educational institutions, public-private partnerships, public bodies, charitable organizations, health care provider alliances and purchasing organizations, so long as the resulting contracts are procured competitively pursuant to subsections A through J of § 5 of the Rules and the purposes of this Policy will be furthered. In the event the Institution engages in a cooperative contract with a private organization or public-private partnership and the contract was not competitively procured pursuant to subsections A through J of § 5 of the Rules, use of the contract by other state agencies, institutions and public bodies shall be prohibited. Notwithstanding all of the above, use of cooperative contracts shall conform to the business requirements of the Commonwealth's electronic procurement system, including the requirement for payment of applicable fees. By October 1 of each year, the President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall make available to the Secretaries of Administration and Technology, the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, and the Auditor of Public Accounts a list of all cooperative contracts and alliances entered into or used during the prior fiscal year.

D. Training; Ethics in Contracting.

The President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure that (i) all Institution officials responsible for and engaged in procurements authorized by the Memorandum of Understanding and this Policy are knowledgeable regarding the requirements of the Memorandum of Understanding, this Policy, and the Ethics in Public Contracting provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, Article 6 (§ 2.2-4367 et seq.) of Chapter 43 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia, (ii) only officials authorized by this Policy and any procedures adopted by the President, acting through the appropriate designee, to implement this Policy are responsible for and engaged in such procurements, and (iii) compliance with the Memorandum of Understanding and this Policy is achieved.

The Institution shall maintain an ongoing program to provide professional development opportunities to its buying staff and to provide methods training to internal staff who are engaged in placing decentralized small purchase transactions.

E. Ethics and University Procurements.

In implementing the authority conferred by this Policy, the personnel administering any procurement shall adhere to the following provisions of the Code of Virginia: the Ethics in Public Contracting provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act, Article 6 (§ 2.2-4367 et seq.) of Chapter 43 of Title 2.2 of the Code of Virginia, the State and Local Government Conflict of Interests Act, Chapter 31 (§ 2.2-3100 et seq.) of Title 2.2, and the Virginia Governmental Frauds Act, Article 1.1 (§ 18.2-498.1 et seq.) of Chapter 12 of Title 18.2 of the Code of Virginia.

VI. INSTITUTION SURPLUS MATERIALS POLICY AND PROCEDURES.

The policy and procedures for disposal of surplus materials shall provide for the sale, environmentally-appropriate disposal, or recycling of surplus materials by the Institution and the retention of the resulting proceeds by the Institution.

VII. ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVE DATES OF RULES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.

A. The President, acting through the appropriate designee, shall adopt one or more comprehensive sets of specific procurement policies and procedures for the Institution, which, in addition to the Rules, implement applicable provisions of law and this Policy. Institution procurements shall be carried out in accordance with this Policy, the Rules, and any implementing policies and procedures adopted by the Institution. The implementing policies and procedures (i) shall include the delegation of procurement authority by the Board to appropriate Institution officials who shall oversee the Institution procurements of goods, services, insurance, and construction, including a grant of authority to such officials to engage in further delegation of authority as the President deems appropriate, and (ii) shall remain consistent with the competitive principles set forth in Part V above.

B. Any implementing policies and procedures adopted pursuant to Part VII A above and the Rules shall become effective on the effective date of the Institution's memorandum of understanding with the Commonwealth, and, as of their effective date, shall be applicable to all procurements undertaken by the Institution on behalf of the Institution for goods, services, insurance, and construction. This Policy, the Rules, and any implementing policies and procedures adopted by an Institution shall not affect existing contracts already in effect prior to the effective date of any memorandum of understanding.

C. The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures for all Institution procurements of goods, services, insurance, and construction, and the disposition of surplus property shall be substantially consistent with the Commonwealth of Virginia Purchasing Manual for Institutions of Higher Education and Their Vendors in their form as of the effective date of this Policy and as amended or changed in the future, and with the Institution's procedures specific to the Acquisition of Goods and Services. The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures shall implement a system of competitive negotiation, and competitive sealed bidding when appropriate, for goods, services, including professional services as defined in the Rules, insurance, and construction.

VIII. REQUIREMENTS FOR RULES AND IMPLEMENTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.

A. Protests, Appeals, Debarment.

The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures for procurements other than capital outlay shall include a process or processes for an administrative appeal by vendors, firms or contractors. Protests and appeals may challenge determinations of vendor, firm or contractor non-responsibility or ineligibility, or the award of contracts, provided that such protests and appeals are filed within the times specified by the Rules. Remedies available shall be limited to reversal of the action challenged or, where a contract already being performed is declared void, compensation for the cost of performance up to the time of such declaration. The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures also may establish the basis and process for debarment of any vendor, firm or contractor.

B. Prompt Payment of Contractors and Subcontractors.

The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures shall include provisions related to prompt payment of outstanding invoices, which shall include payment of interest on properly-presented invoices outstanding more than seven days beyond the payment date, at a rate no higher than the lowest prime rate charged by any commercial bank as published in the Wall Street Journal. The payment date shall be the later of 30 days from the date of the receipt of goods or invoice, or the date established by the contract. All contracts also shall require prompt payment of subcontractors by the general contractor, upon receipt of payment by the Institution.

C. Types of Procurements.

The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures shall implement a system of competitive negotiation for professional services, as defined in the Rules, and shall implement purchasing procedures developed to maximize competition given the size and duration of the contract, and the needs of the Institution. Such policies and procedures may include special provisions for procurements such as emergency procurements, sole source procurements, brand name procurements, small purchases, procurements in which only one qualified vendor responds, and others.

D. Approval and Public Notice of Procurements.

The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures shall provide for approval of solicitation documents by an authorized individual and for reasonable public notice of procurements, given the size and nature of the need and the applicability of any Virginia Freedom of Information Act exemption.

E. Administration of Contracts.

The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures shall contain provisions related to the administration of contracts, including contract claims, modifications, extensions and assignments.

F. Non-Discrimination.

The Rules and the Institution's implementing policies and procedures shall provide for a nondiscriminatory procurement process that prohibits discrimination because of race, religion, color, sex or national origin of the bidder or offeror in the solicitation and award of contracts; and shall include appropriate provisions to effectuate fair and reasonable consideration of women-owned, minority-owned and small businesses and to promote and encourage a diversity of suppliers.

ATTACHMENT 1 Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction by a Public Institution of Higher Education of the Commonwealth of Virginia Governed by Subchapter 2 of the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia

In accordance with the provisions of the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia, and in particular § 23-38.90 of the Restructuring Act, the governing body of a public institution of higher education of the Commonwealth of Virginia that has entered into a memorandum of understanding with the Commonwealth pursuant to Subchapter 2 of the Restructuring Act must adopt the following Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction to govern the procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction by the Institution:

§ 1. Purpose.

The purpose of these Rules is to enunciate the public policies pertaining to procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction by the Institution from nongovernmental sources, to include governmental procurement that may or may not result in monetary consideration for either party. These Rules shall apply whether the consideration is monetary or nonmonetary and regardless of whether the Institution, the contractor, or some third party is providing the consideration.

§ 2. Scope of Procurement Authority.

Subject to these Rules, and the Institution’s continued substantial compliance with the terms and conditions of its memorandum of understanding with the Commonwealth pursuant to § 23-38.90 and the requirements of Chapter 4.10 of the Restructuring Act, the Institution shall have and shall be authorized to have and exercise all of the authority relating to procurement of goods, services, insurance, and construction, including but not limited to capital outlay-related procurement and information technology-related procurement, that Institutions are authorized to exercise pursuant to Subchapter 2 of the Restructuring Act.

§ 3. Competition is the Priority.

To the end that the Institution shall obtain high quality goods and services at reasonable cost, that all procurement procedures be conducted in an open, fair and impartial manner with avoidance of any impropriety or appearance of impropriety, that all qualified vendors have access to the Institution’s business and that no offeror be arbitrarily or capriciously excluded, it is the intent of the governing body of the Institution that competition be sought to the maximum feasible degree, that procurement procedures involve openness and administrative efficiency, that individual public bodies enjoy broad flexibility in fashioning details of such competition, that the rules governing contract awards be made clear in advance of the competition, that specifications reflect the procurement needs of the purchasing body rather than being drawn to favor a particular vendor, and that the purchaser and vendor freely exchange information concerning what is sought to be procured and what is offered. The Institution may consider best value concepts when procuring goods and nonprofessional services, but not construction or professional services. Professional services will be procured using a qualification-based selection process. The criteria, factors, and basis for consideration of best value and the process for the consideration of best value shall be as stated in the procurement solicitation.

§ 4. Definitions.

As used in these Rules:

“Affiliate” means an individual or business that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another individual or business. A person controls an entity if the person owns, directly or indirectly, more than 10 percent of the voting securities of the entity. For the purposes of this definition “voting security” means a security that (i) confers upon the holder the right to vote for the election of members of the board of directors or similar governing body of the business or (ii) is convertible into, or entitles the holder to receive, upon its exercise, a security that confers such a right to vote. A general partnership interest shall be deemed to be a voting security.

“Best value,” as predetermined in the solicitation, means the overall combination of quality, price, and various elements of required services that in total are optimal relative to the Institution’s needs.

“Business” means any type of corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, or sole proprietorship operated for profit.

“Competitive negotiation” is a method of contractor selection that includes the following elements:

1. Issuance of a written Request for Proposal indicating in general terms that which is sought to be procured, specifying the factors that will be used in evaluating the proposal and containing or incorporating by reference the other applicable contractual terms and conditions, including any unique capabilities or qualifications that will be required of the contractor.

2. Public notice of the Request for Proposal at least 10 days prior to the date set for receipt of proposals by publication in a newspaper or newspapers of general circulation in the area in which the contract is to be performed so as to provide reasonable notice to the maximum number of offerors that can be reasonably anticipated to submit proposals in response to the particular request. Public notice also shall be published on the Department of General Services’ central electronic procurement website and may be published on other appropriate websites. In addition, proposals may be solicited directly from potential contractors.

3. a. Procurement of professional services. The procurement of professional services for capital projects shall be conducted using a qualification-based selection process. The Institution shall engage in individual discussions with two or more offerors deemed fully qualified, responsible and suitable on the basis of initial responses and with emphasis on professional competence, to provide the required services. Repetitive informal interviews shall be permissible. The offerors shall be encouraged to elaborate on their qualifications and performance data or staff expertise pertinent to the proposed project, as well as alternative concepts. The Request for Proposal shall not, however, request that offerors furnish estimates of man-hours or cost for services. At the discussion stage, the Institution may discuss nonbinding estimates of total project costs, including, but not limited to, life-cycle costing, and where appropriate, nonbinding estimates of price for services. Proprietary information from competing offerors shall not be disclosed to the public or to competitors. At the conclusion of discussion, outlined in this subdivision, on the basis of evaluation factors published in the Request for Proposal and all information developed in the selection process to this point, the Institution shall select in the order of preference two or more offerors whose professional qualifications and proposed services are deemed most meritorious. Negotiations shall then be conducted, beginning with the offeror ranked first. If a contract satisfactory and advantageous to the Institution can be negotiated at a price considered fair and reasonable, the award shall be made to that offeror. Otherwise, negotiations with the offeror ranked first shall be formally terminated and negotiations conducted with the offeror ranked second, and so on until such a contract can be negotiated at a fair and reasonable price. Should the Institution determine in writing and in its sole discretion that only one offeror is fully qualified, or that one offeror is clearly more highly qualified and suitable than the others under consideration, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that offeror.

A contract for architectural or professional engineering services relating to construction projects may be negotiated by the Institution, for multiple projects provided (i) the projects require similar experience and expertise, and (ii) the nature of the projects is clearly identified in the Request for Proposal. Under such contract, (a) the fair and reasonable prices, as negotiated, shall be used in determining the cost of each project performed, (b) the sum of all projects performed in one contract term shall be as set in the Request for Proposal; and (c) the project fee of any single project shall not exceed the term limit as set in the Request for Proposal. Any unused amounts from any contract term may be carried forward. Competitive negotiations for such contracts may result in awards to more than one offeror provided the Request for Proposal stated the potential for a multi-vendor award.

Multiphase professional services contracts satisfactory and advantageous to the Institution for environmental, location, design and inspection work regarding construction of infrastructure projects may be negotiated and awarded based on qualifications at a fair and reasonable price for the first phase only, when completion of the earlier phases is necessary to provide information critical to the negotiation of a fair and reasonable price for succeeding phases. Prior to the procurement of any such contract, the Institution shall state the anticipated intended total scope of the project and determine in writing that the nature of the work is such that the best interests of such Institution require awarding the contract.

b. Procurement of other than professional services. Selection shall be made of two or more offerors deemed to be fully qualified and best suited among those submitting proposals, on the basis of the factors involved in the Request for Proposal, including price if so stated in the Request for Proposal. Negotiations shall then be conducted with each of the offerors so selected. Price shall be considered, but need not be the sole determining factor. After negotiations have been conducted with each offeror so selected, the Institution shall select the offeror which, in its opinion, has made the best proposal, and shall award the contract to that offeror. When the terms and conditions of multiple awards are so provided in the Request for Proposal, awards may be made to more than one offeror. Should the Institution determine in writing and in its sole discretion that only one offeror has made the best proposal, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that offeror.

“Competitive sealed bidding” is a method of contractor selection, other than for professional services, which includes the following elements:

1. Issuance of a written Invitation to Bid containing or incorporating by reference the specifications and contractual terms and conditions applicable to the procurement. Unless the Institution has provided for prequalification of bidders, the Invitation to Bid shall include a statement of any requisite qualifications of potential contractors. When it is impractical to prepare initially a purchase description to support an award based on prices, an Invitation to Bid may be issued requesting the submission of unpriced offers to be followed by an Invitation to Bid limited to those bidders whose offers have been qualified under the criteria set forth in the first solicitation.

2. Public notice of the Invitation to Bid at least 10 days prior to the date set for receipt of bids by publication on the Department of General Services’ central electronic procurement website. Public notice also may be published in a newspaper of general circulation or on other appropriate websites, or both. In addition, bids may be solicited directly from potential contractors. Any additional solicitations shall include businesses selected from a list made available by the Department of Minority Business Enterprise.

3. Public opening and announcement of all bids received.

4. Evaluation of bids based upon the requirements set forth in the invitation, which may include special qualifications of potential contractors, life-cycle costing, value analysis, and any other criteria such as inspection, testing, quality, workmanship, delivery, and suitability for a particular purpose, which are helpful

HOUSE BILL NO. 1390 Offered January 9, 2008 A BILL to amend and reenact § 23-38.90 of the Code of Virginia, relating to operational authority for public institutions of higher education in information technology, procurement, and capital projects excluding leases of real property. ---------- Patron-- Putney ---------- Committee Referral Pending ----------

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:

1. That § 23-38.90 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:

§ 23-38.90. Memoranda of understanding.

1. The institution has received and maintained Council certification pursuant to § 23-9.6:1.01 for the most recent year that the Council has completed certification;

3. The institution must adopt at least one new performance standard for each area of operational authority for which a memorandum of understanding is requested. The performance standard shall be developed in consultation with the Secretary of Education, the appropriate Cabinet Secretary, and the Council. Each performance standard and its respective targets must be approved by the Council and shall become part of the certification required by § 23-9.6:1.01; and

4. The institution must adopt at least one new goal, in addition to the goals provided by § 23-38.88, for each area of operational authority for which a memorandum of understanding is requested. The goals shall be developed in consultation with the Secretary of Education, the appropriate Cabinet Secretary, and the Council. Each goal must be approved by the Council and shall become part of the certification required by § 23-9.6:1.01.

§ 2.0. The following provides the Policy for Information Technology:

I. PREAMBLE.

II. DEFINITIONS.

As used in this Information Technology Policy, the following terms have the following meanings, unless the context requires otherwise:

"Board of Visitors" or "Board" means the governing body of any public institution of higher education in Virginia.

"Information technology" or "IT" shall have the same meaning as set forth in § 2.2-2006 of the Code of Virginia, as it currently exists and from time to time may be amended.

"Policy" means this Information Technology Policy adopted by the Board of Visitors.

"Public institution of higher education" or "Institution" means a two-year or four-year public institution of higher education entering into a memorandum of understanding with the appropriate Cabinet Secretary or Secretaries, as designated by the Governor.

"Restructuring Act" means the Restructured Higher Education Financial and Administrative Operations Act, Chapter 4.10 (§ 23-38.88 et seq.) of Title 23 of the Code of Virginia.

"State Chief Information Officer" or "State CIO" means the Chief Information Officer of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

III. SCOPE OF POLICY.

1b. The Institution has successfully implemented at least one of the following major systems in the last five years: a financial system, a human resources system, or a student information system and the Institution has at least one project manager on staff that has successfully attained certification as a Project Management Professional from the Project Management Institute and has completed the Commonwealth Overview training, or has passed the Core and Facilitation processes test; and

2. The Institution has the Chief Information Officer position reporting to the president or chancellor, or to a position of no more than one level below the president or chancellor; and

C. Specifically with regard to the procurement of information technology and telecommunications goods and services, including automated data processing hardware and software, an Institution may elect to have all such procurements be governed by either (i) the Virginia Public Procurement Act (§ 2.2-4300 et seq. of the Code of Virginia) or (ii) the Rules Governing Procurement of Goods, Services, Insurance, and Construction that are incorporated in § 3.0 of this Act.