Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
HB1491: Temporary detention order; shall not exceed 96 hours.
Chief Patron
Del.
Dave Nutter (R-7)
Dave Nutter
(R-7)
Christiansburg, VA
Served: 2002–
Progress
| Introduced | |
| Passed Committee | |
| Passed House | |
| Passed Senate | |
| Signed by Governor | |
| Became Law |
Status
02/12/2008: Failed to Pass in Committee
Summary
Temporary detention orders; duration. Provides that the duration of temporary detention shall not exceed 96 hours.
View Full Text »Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight has video: 01/17/2008, 01/31/2008, 02/08/2008, 02/08/2008 and 02/12/2008.
Poll Results
1 vote
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Introduced: January 08, 2008
Status: in subcommittee
: Emergency custody orders, temporary detention orders, etc.; eliminates & adds requirements.Status: in subcommittee
Introduced: December 12, 2007
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
: Crisis intervention team pilot programs; established for persons with mental illness, report.Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Introduced: December 21, 2007
Status: In Committee
: Involuntary commitment; criteria.Status: In Committee
Introduced: December 26, 2007
Status: in subcommittee
: Independent examiner; records to be reviewed.Status: in subcommittee
Introduced: January 04, 2008
Status: signed by governor
: Emergency custody; who may accept custody.Status: signed by governor

Comments
THIS IS UNCONSCIONABLE! I strongly oppose this bill.
May I remind you 96 hours is 4 DAYS! These agencies are already authorized two "working days" (48 Hours). And the law specifically excludes weekends and holidays. Guess these agencies don't want to be inconvenienced. So may I ask “Where is the concern for the "inconvenience" of a detained person?”
May I add the detained person is typically imprisoned in an overbearing and depersonalizing institutional setting with all of its "turning one's life upside down" aspects during this period. For example, in my case, I was forcibly separated from my wife, not allowed to see her again, not allowed to contact her, and not even allowed to say goodbye to her, much less guarantee she was adequately settled in a room. I was literally thrown out of the hospital. AND THIS WAS BEFORE A COMMITMENT HEARING.
May I add the criterion for a TDO is barn door wide and exceedingly ambiguous. Indeed, it seems daring to disagree with a prescreener is in and of itself a cause for a TDO under the "incapable or unwilling to volunteer for treatment" criterion.
As such, the current two day limit is more than sufficient to determine if there is sufficient cause to commit. Indeed, if such information is not sufficiently researchable within two days, it seems unlikely the criterion for commitment will be met with further research. Is not the purpose of commitment to provide a "safe and secure environment" for a current "crisis" and not an opportunity for our big brother nanny state to go over a person's life with a fine tooth comb?
May I suggest these lackadaisical CSB employees get off of their rears and do their job with the proper mindset that they are grossly disrupting a detained person 's life and are grossly violating a detained person 's basic human and civil rights.