Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
HB172: Insurance liability; disclosure of limits prior to filing a lawsuit.
Chief Patron
Del.
Terry Kilgore (R-1)
Terry Kilgore
(R-1)
Gate City, VA
Served: 1994–
Progress
| Introduced | |
| Passed Committee | |
| Passed House | |
| Passed Senate | |
| Signed by Governor | |
| Became Law |
Status
04/11/2008: signed by governor
Summary
Civil procedure; disclosure of insurance liability limits. Requires disclosure of the liability limits to an attorney for an injured person, prior to the filing of a civil action for personal injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident, after the attorney provides written notice of representation.
View Full Text »Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight has video: 01/10/2008, 02/11/2008, 02/12/2008, 02/13/2008, 02/13/2008, 02/14/2008, 02/14/2008, 02/29/2008, 03/07/2008 and 03/07/2008.
Photosynthesis
Cast Your Vote
Do you support this bill in its current form?
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Introduced: December 21, 2007
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
: Medical bills and charges; patient, patient's attorney, etc. may obtain list at no cost.Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Introduced: January 18, 2008
Status: signed by governor
: Social Services, Department of; nonattorney employees to complete, sign, file petitions & motions.Status: signed by governor
Introduced: December 26, 2007
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
: Motor vehicle liability insurance; increases coverage limits.Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Introduced: December 26, 2007
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
: Motor vehicle; forfeiture thereof for two or more offenses of driving without insurance.Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Introduced: January 09, 2008
Status: signed by governor
: Social Services, Department of; nonattorney employees to complete, sign, and file petitions, etc.Status: signed by governor

Comments
This bill is not a very good idea. It would tend to encourage the worst sort of predatory litigation rather than a rational consideration of what is actually justice.
The maximum amount of money available to a defendant to cover a judgment is irrelevant to the pursuit of justice. The damages are what they are. If a man runs his car into another man's truck, the cost to repair the truck remains the same whether the driver of the car has $10M at his disposal or $500,000.
The only reason for this bill would be to allow the rare yet dangerous predatory sort of plaintiff to decide how much he can shake someone down for. It's got nothing to do with anything that has a place in the justice system.
Post a Public Comment About this Bill