Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
HB256: Involuntary outpatient commitment; five day review of compliance.
Chief Patron
Del.
Bill Fralin (R-17)
Bill Fralin
(R-17)
Roanoke, VA
Served: 2004–
Progress
| Introduced | |
| Passed Committee | |
| Passed House | |
| Passed Senate | |
| Signed by Governor | |
| Became Law |
Status
02/12/2008: Failed to Pass in Committee
Summary
Involuntary outpatient commitment; five day review of compliance. Requires the community services board designated to monitor compliance with an order for involuntary outpatient commitment to contact the person who is the subject of the order for involuntary outpatient commitment five days after the order for involuntary outpatient treatment is entered, to determine whether the person has complied with the order, and to identify and take all reasonable steps to resolve issues that may have resulted in noncompliance. Thereafter, the community services board, behavioral health authority, or designated provider shall continue to monitor the person's compliance with the treatment ordered by the court.
View Full Text »Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight has video: 01/10/2008, 01/24/2008, 01/24/2008 and 02/12/2008.
Photosynthesis
This bill is being tracked by Andrea H., A More Perfect Union, Valerie F., Virginia Interfaith Center, spotter, Legal Aid Justice Center and Aimee.
Cast Your Vote
Do you support this bill in its current form?
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Status: Passed the House
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Status: in subcommittee
Status: signed by governor
Status: in subcommittee

Comments
This is absurd. It will take 5 days to develop a decent and appropriate outpatient treatment plan. How can someone comply with a plan that won't have been written yet, let alone implemented?
Also, this change would seem to make outpatient commitment/forced drugging in one's own home indefinite instead of the current 180 days as it gives no time limit which current law does.
Forced drugging in the community is wrong in the first place, but setting folks up for failure from the start is ridiculous.
This bill did not cross over. I would say it is dead but the site won't let me say the same thing.
Post a Public Comment About this Bill