Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
HB552: Sex offender registry; removal of name and information.
Chief Patron
Del.
Morgan Griffith (R-8)
Morgan Griffith
(R-8)
Salem, VA
Served: 1994–
Progress
| Introduced | |
| Passed Committee | |
| Passed House | |
| Passed Senate | |
| Signed by Governor | |
| Became Law |
Status
02/12/2008: Failed to Pass in Committee
Summary
Removal of name and information from sex offender registry. Provides that any person required to register, other than a person who has been convicted of any (i) sexually violent offense, (ii) two or more offenses for which registration is required, (iii) a violation of former § 18.2-67.2:1, or (iv) murder, may petition the circuit court for removal of his name and all identifying information from the sex offender registry on or after July 1, 2008, whose offense requiring registration was committed before July 1, 1994 (inception of the registry). Currently such a person may not be on file for such removal earlier than 10 years after the date of initial registration.
View Full Text »Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight has video: 01/22/2008, 01/22/2008, 01/29/2008, 01/29/2008 and 02/12/2008.
Photosynthesis
This bill is being tracked by L. L., Cristina, Lisa M. and Families and Allies of Virginia's Youth.
Cast Your Vote
Do you support this bill in its current form?
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Status: signed by governor
Status: signed by governor
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee

Comments
Virginia desperately needs to go to a risk-based system of assessing who needs to be on the list.
It is my understanding that Virginia, in its last round of legislation, went the way of other states, such as Oklahoma in reclassifying the majority of its sex offenders as violent, whether their crimes included actual violence (or sex, for that matter) or not.
All such offenders would be forever excluding from being removed from the registry, no matter how old the offense, or how strong the evidence of rehabilitation. That is wrong.
Given the provisions set forth, this is a good bill. It allows those who have not recidivated for over 14 years and who have not committed what are considered violent offenses to actually be part of society.
Post a Public Comment About this Bill