HB567: Sexual offenses; those convicted prohibited entry onto school property.
Chief Patron
Del.
Anne Crockett-Stark (R-6)

Anne Crockett-Stark
(R-6)
Wytheville, VA
Served: 2006–
Progress
 |
Introduced |
 |
Passed Committee |
 |
Passed House |
 |
Passed Senate |
 |
Signed by Governor |
 |
Became Law |
Status
04/02/2008: signed by governor
View Entire History
- 01/07/2008 Committee
- 01/07/2008 Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/09/08 086351480
- 01/07/2008 Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
- 01/08/2008 Impact statement from VCSC (HB567)
- 01/16/2008 Assigned Courts sub: Criminal
- 02/04/2008 Impact statement from DPB (HB567)
- 02/04/2008 Reported from Courts of Justice (22-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/04/2008 Referred to Committee on Appropriations
- 02/06/2008 Assigned App. sub: Public Safety (Sherwood)
- 02/08/2008 Reported from Appropriations (24-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/09/2008 Read first time
- 02/11/2008 Read second time and engrossed
- 02/12/2008 Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N)
- 02/12/2008 VOTE: BLOCK VOTE PASSAGE (98-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/12/2008 Communicated to Senate
- 02/13/2008 Constitutional reading dispensed
- 02/13/2008 Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
- 02/14/2008 Assigned Courts sub: Criminal
- 02/28/2008 Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/29/2008 Committee substitute printed 080911480-S1
- 02/29/2008 Impact statement from VCSC (HB567S1)
- 03/03/2008 Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/04/2008 Read third time
- 03/04/2008 Reading of substitute waived
- 03/04/2008 Committee substitute agreed to 080911480-S1
- 03/04/2008 Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute HB567S1
- 03/04/2008 Passed Senate with substitute (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/05/2008 VOTE: --- ADOPTION (1-Y 97-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/05/2008 VOTE: --- ADOPTION #2 (0-Y 99-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/05/2008 Placed on Calendar
- 03/05/2008 Senate substitute rejected by House (1-Y 97-N)
- 03/05/2008 VOTE: --- REJECTED (1-Y 97-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/05/2008 Reconsideration of Senate substitute agreed to by House
- 03/05/2008 Senate substitute rejected by House (0-Y 99-N)
- 03/05/2008 VOTE: --- REJECTED #2 (0-Y 99-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/06/2008 Senate insisted on substitute (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/06/2008 Senate requested conference committee
- 03/06/2008 House acceded to request
- 03/06/2008 Conferees appointed by House
- 03/06/2008 Delegates: Crockett-Stark, Athey, Dance
- 03/06/2008 Conferees appointed by Senate
- 03/06/2008 Senators: Deeds, Puller, Cuccinelli
- 03/07/2008 Conference report agreed to by House (93-Y 0-N)
- 03/07/2008 VOTE: --- ADOPTION (93-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/07/2008 Conference substitute printed 081590480-H1
- 03/08/2008 Reading of conference report waived
- 03/08/2008 Conference report agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/10/2008 Impact statement from VCSC (HB567H1)
- 03/24/2008 Enrolled
- 03/24/2008 Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB567ER)
- 03/24/2008 Signed by Speaker
- 03/26/2008 Signed by President
- 04/02/2008 G Approved by Governor-Chapter 781 (effective 7/1/08)
- 04/03/2008 Impact statement from DPB (HB567ER)
Summary
Sex offenses prohibiting entry onto school property; penalty.
Provides that every adult who is convicted of a sexually violent offense,
as defined in § 9.1-902, shall be prohibited from entering and being present
upon any property he knows or has reason to know is a public or private
elementary or secondary school or child day center property. Currently, the
prohibition only applies during school hours.
View Full Text »
Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight
has video: 02/04/2008, 02/04/2008, 02/06/2008, 02/06/2008, 02/11/2008, 02/12/2008, 02/13/2008, 02/13/2008, 02/14/2008, 02/14/2008, 02/29/2008, 03/06/2008, 03/07/2008 and 03/07/2008.
Poll Results
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Subscribe

Keep track of the status of this bill as it moves through the General Assembly
—
subscribe
via RSS.
Comments
This bill would ban sex offenders -- a group that includes lots of people who are no danger to kids (an 18-year-old has consensual sex with a 15-year-old 20 years ago, for example) -- from going to a public building where many activities that have nothing to do with children are being conducted. Adult basketball leagues in the gym at night, public tennis courts, political conventions and visiting ballet performances, just for a few examples. That makes no sense.
One impact not noted by cvllelaw is that many offenders will be prevented from attending their churches if a preschool operates there during the week.
It should be noted that in Virginia, many non-violent offenses have been reclassified in the past few years to be considered "sexually violent" even if there was never any contact with a child at all. Although Rob Bell argued last year that this bill applied to only "violent" offenders, this is simply not true and has had the effect of elevating many minor offenders to "sexually violent" status.
sorry, this one stinks too. what about the wrongfully convicted 'sexual predators' that have children. now they can't even go to their own kid's christmas programs??nope, too many people are getting 'over protective' by segrating others into the have's and 'should have nots'..
I think everyone else has said what I would have said. If these people have served their time and have been deemed by the courts not to be a threat to society (post probation, etc.), have proven their willingness to be rehabilitated, these laws could only have a negative effect.
This bill was heard in sub-committee 1/16. Despite testimony and delegate discussion about the fact that this bill would have serious negative impact on former offenders, it was reported to the Courts of Justice.
Issues included the following:
* Many churches have services in schools.
* Many/most churches provide child care during the week and are included in this bill.
* Community colleges often hold classes in schools.
* Many GED programs are held in schools.
* AA/NA meetings are often held in schools or in churches (that are off-limits because of the daycare issue)
* In rural communities, many organizations hold their meetings in schools
* Public community hearings are often held in schools
* A variety of non-school-related performances are given in schools
This bill will ban former offenders from access to education, church, rehabilitative services, and many community events. Testimony regarding the ineffectiveness of such laws was, as usual, disregarded.
What was appalling was that the delegate who talked the most about the variety of activities held in schools and the major impact it would have on former offenders STILL voted for it.
Rant over ...