Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
HB94: Secondary highway system; allocates construction funds among counties based on population.
Chief Patron
Del.
Paul Nichols (D-51)
Paul Nichols
(D-51)
Woodbridge, VA
Served: 2008–
Progress
| Introduced | |
| Passed Committee | |
| Passed House | |
| Passed Senate | |
| Signed by Governor | |
| Became Law |
Status
02/07/2008: Failed to Pass in Committee
Summary
Secondary highway system construction allocations. Allocates construction funds among the counties in the state secondary highway system solely on the basis of population. Presently, allocations are made on the basis of population (80%) and area (20%).
View Full Text »Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight has video: 01/23/2008, 01/23/2008, 01/24/2008, 01/24/2008, 01/28/2008, 02/01/2008, 02/01/2008, 02/07/2008 and 02/07/2008.
Photosynthesis
Cast Your Vote
Do you support this bill in its current form?
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Introduced: December 13, 2007
Status: enacted
: Virginia-North Carolina Interstate Toll Road Compact; repealing Compact.Status: enacted
Introduced: January 04, 2008
Status: in subcommittee
: High-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes; use by vehicles bearing special fuel vehicle license plates.Status: in subcommittee
Introduced: January 09, 2008
Status: In Committee
: Motor fuels tax; funding for transportation-related alternatives.Status: In Committee
Introduced: January 09, 2008
Status: signed by governor
: High-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes; revises procedures for enforcing violations.Status: signed by governor
Introduced: December 21, 2007
Status: Passed the Senate
: Transportation Plan; to include regional goals and performance measures for highway districts.Status: Passed the Senate

Comments
So there's no need to consider the size of a county when considering how much funding to provide for their roads? Is it possible that large counties need longer roads?
What a terrible proposal.
I can't see any way that this would be fair. I live in a county that would probably do pretty well under this, but there are lots of really massive counties with low populations (Buckingham comes to mind) who need to maintain pretty sizable road networks. Surely there's a funding algorithm that can be arrived at using hard data on roads and populations per county. This sort of throwing-darts approach is no good.
Sounds like U.T. to me. Urban tyranny.
Post a Public Comment About this Bill