Wednesday, December 3, 2008
The General Assembly is not in session.
Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
SB298: Smoke Free Air Act; smoking in public places.
Chief Patron
Sen.
Mary Margaret Whipple (D-Arlington)
Mary Margaret Whipple
(D-Arlington)
Served: 1996–
Progress
☑ |
Introduced |
☒ |
Passed Committee |
☐ |
Passed House |
☑ |
Passed Senate |
☐ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Status
03/03/2008: Failed to Pass in Committee
View Entire History
Summary
Virginia Smoke Free Air Act; smoking in public places; civil penalties. Moves the law restricting smoking in buildings and other enclosed areas from the title relating to local government (15.2) to the title relating to health (32.1) and prohibits smoking indoors in most buildings or enclosed areas frequented by the public. Exceptions are provided for (i) private homes, private residences, and private automobiles, and home-based businesses, unless used in conjunction with a licensed child care, adult day care, or health care facility; (ii) private clubs, except when being used for functions attended by persons other than members and invited guests; (iii) hotel or motel rooms designated as smoking rooms that are offered for rent to the public; (iv) specialty tobacco stores; (v) tobacco manufacturers; and (vi) private and semiprivate rooms in nursing homes and long-term care facilities. The bill requires the posting of "No Smoking" signs inside and at the entrances of areas where smoking is prohibited. Any person who continues to smoke in an area in which smoking is prohibited will be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $100 for the first offense, and $250 for subsequent offenses. Failure to comply with the smoking restrictions will subject proprietors to a $200 civil penalty for the first offense and $500 for subsequent offenses.
View Full Text »Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight has video: 02/01/2008, 02/01/2008, 02/04/2008, 02/04/2008, 02/05/2008, 02/07/2008, 02/07/2008 and 02/12/2008.
Identical Bills
The following bills are identical to this one: HB500
Introduced: 2008-01-07
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Introduced: 2008-01-08
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Poll Results
40 votes
Tags
Bill Text
Related Bills
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Status: Failed to Pass in Committee
Subscribe
Keep track of the status of this bill as it moves through the General Assembly
— subscribe
via RSS.
Comments
I would add an exception to the exception for autos, similar to this California law:
CALIFORNIA (NEWSCHANNEL 3) - In California, a new law went into effect on new year's day which bans smoking in any car where a minor is present. It's only the third law of its kind and it's by far the most comprehensive. The Environmental Protection Agency says the air inside a car where a person is smoking is 10-times more toxic than what is considered dangerous for breathing.
The presentation of this Bill is deceiving. On the links page it is listed as pertaining to fossil fuel consumption but the actual text is about restricting property rights of business owners.
Brandon, you may have clicked on the wrong link, or perhaps there was a transient problem on Richmond Sunlight. HB514 is the bill regarding fossil fuels, and presumably the one you're looking for.
In any case, whatever the source of the problem, it's not the legislature's fault, but only Richmond Sunlight's. Sorry for the trouble!
When I go to a public restaurant and am asked smoking or non smoking,I opt for non. Why then when I go to a public swimming pool am I not asked peeing or non peeing. Having a non smoking section of a restaurant is simply stupid.
I am doing a reseach project about this bill and I am wondering what is the status of this bill?
I support this bill. I'm tired of going into public places and being subjected to the smell of smoke. I go through the trouble of bathing and trying to look good, only to come out smelling like an ashtray! It's gross!
Aren't there a lot of places that non-smokers can go to that don't allow smoking? Non smokers always have a choice to find one of those places. It's not the fault of smokers that the favorite places of non-smokers allow smoking. Let your money do the talking. Don't give it to those place that do allow smoking. If they really want to make a difference the state should give a good tax incentive for restaurants and bars to be non-smoking. Just leave it up to business owners.
This bill, along with a couple others, was killed in subcommittee. It's not officially dead because it can be revived by the Committee Chair, but she has expressed no intent of doing so.