SB559: Composite index, local; number of students.
Chief Patron
Sen.
Mark Obenshain (R-26)
Mark Obenshain
(R-26)
Served: 2004–
Progress
 |
Introduced |
|
Passed Committee |
|
Passed House |
|
Passed Senate |
|
Signed by Governor |
|
Became Law |
Status
03/27/2008: signed by governor
View Entire History
- 01/09/2008 Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/09/08 086251288
- 01/09/2008 Referred to Committee on Education and Health
- 01/17/2008 Rereferred from Education and Health (12-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 01/17/2008 Rereferred to Finance
- 01/18/2008 Impact statement from DPB (SB559)
- 02/05/2008 Reported from Finance with substitute (7-Y 5-N 1-A) (see vote tally)
- 02/06/2008 Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/06/2008 Committee substitute printed 082569288-S1
- 02/07/2008 Read second time
- 02/07/2008 Passed by for the day
- 02/08/2008 Read second time
- 02/08/2008 Reading of substitute waived
- 02/08/2008 Committee substitute agreed to 082569288-S1
- 02/08/2008 Reading of amendment waived
- 02/08/2008 Amendment by Senator Petersen rejected
- 02/08/2008 Passed by for the day
- 02/11/2008 Read second time
- 02/11/2008 Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute SB559S1
- 02/11/2008 Passed by for the day
- 02/12/2008 Read third time
- 02/12/2008 Engrossment reconsidered by Senate (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/12/2008 Committee substitute reconsidered (38-Y 1-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/12/2008 Committee substitute rejected
- 02/12/2008 Floor substitute printed 083374288-S2 (Obenshain)
- 02/12/2008 Reading of substitute waived
- 02/12/2008 Substitute by Senator Obenshain agreed to 083374288-S2
- 02/12/2008 Engrossed by Senate - floor substitute SB559S2
- 02/12/2008 Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/12/2008 Passed Senate (23-Y 15-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/12/2008 Communicated to House
- 02/13/2008 Impact statement from DPB (SB559S2)
- 02/14/2008 Placed on Calendar
- 02/14/2008 Read first time
- 02/14/2008 Referred to Committee on Education
- 02/20/2008 Reported from Education (16-Y 4-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/20/2008 Referred to Committee on Appropriations
- 02/22/2008 Assigned App. sub: Elementary & Secondary Education (Tata)
- 02/27/2008 Reported from Appropriations with amendments (21-Y 2-N) (see vote tally)
- 02/29/2008 Read second time
- 03/03/2008 Read third time
- 03/03/2008 Committee amendments agreed to
- 03/03/2008 Engrossed by House as amended
- 03/03/2008 Passed House with amendments (76-Y 22-N)
- 03/03/2008 VOTE: --- PASSAGE (76-Y 22-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/05/2008 House amendments agreed to by Senate (37-Y 3-N) (see vote tally)
- 03/08/2008 Enrolled
- 03/08/2008 Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB559ER)
- 03/08/2008 Signed by Speaker
- 03/10/2008 Impact statement from DPB (SB559ER)
- 03/11/2008 Signed by President
- 03/12/2008 Signed by Speaker
- 03/12/2008 Signed by President
- 03/27/2008 G Approved by Governor-Chapter 705 (effective 7/1/08)
Summary
Local composite index; number of students. Increases from
350 to 1200 the maximum number of students allowed for a school division to
qualify to have its state share of aid adjusted, based on a cost-sharing
agreement with a neighboring school division.
View Full Text »
Video
Votes were cast on this bill on the following dates for which Richmond Sunlight
has video: 01/09/2008, 01/09/2008, 01/17/2008, 02/06/2008, 02/06/2008, 02/07/2008, 02/07/2008, 02/08/2008, 02/08/2008, 02/11/2008, 02/12/2008, 02/13/2008, 02/13/2008, 02/14/2008, 02/14/2008, 02/20/2008, 02/22/2008, 02/22/2008, 02/29/2008 and 03/11/2008.
Poll Results
Tags
Bill Text
Subscribe
Keep track of the status of this bill as it moves through the General Assembly
—
subscribe
via RSS.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Comments
Rural counties like the ones who would benefit from this often have land use policies that help farmers but penalize schools that don't do well with the calculations that divide up state Ed. funding. This bill would have minimal fiscal impact statewide but could go a long way to make state division of ed funding fairer for small rural school divisions.
anyone know anything about a revised FIS or new language that would make the FIS more amendable to the budget analysts?