Tracking Virginia’s General Assembly
since 2007.
SB605: Court of Appeals; en banc hearings.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia:
1. That § 17.1-402 of the Code of Virginia is amended and reenacted as follows:
§ 17.1-402. Sessions; panels; quorum; presiding judges; hearings en banc.
A. The Court of Appeals shall sit at such locations within the Commonwealth as the chief judge, upon consultation with the other judges of the court, shall designate so as to provide, insofar as feasible, convenient access to the various geographic areas of the Commonwealth. The chief judge shall schedule sessions of the court as required to discharge expeditiously the business of the court.
B. The Court of Appeals shall sit in panels of at least three judges each. The presence of all judges in the panel shall be necessary to constitute a quorum. The chief judge shall assign the members to panels and, insofar as practicable, rotate the membership of the panels. The chief judge shall preside over any panel of which he is a member and shall designate the presiding judges of the other panels.
C. Each panel shall hear and determine, independently of the others, the petitions for appeal and appeals granted in criminal cases and the other cases assigned to that panel.
D. The Court of Appeals shall sit en banc (i) when there is a
dissent in the panel to which the case was originally assigned and an aggrieved
party requests an en banc hearing and at least three other four
judges of the court vote in favor of such a hearing or (ii) when
any judge of any panel shall certify that in his opinion a decision of such
panel of the court is in conflict with a prior decision of the court or of any
panel thereof and three other judges of the court concur in that view. The
court may sit en banc upon its own motion at any time, in any case in which a
majority of the court determines it is appropriate to do so. The court sitting
en banc shall consider and decide the case and may overrule any previous
decision by any panel or of the full court.
E. The court may sit en banc with no fewer than eight judges. In all cases decided by the court en banc, the concurrence of at least a majority of the judges sitting shall be required to reverse a judgment, in whole or in part.
Additional Data
Explanation
This is the actual text of the bill — the legislation itself. Generally this is amending existing law, proposing the addition or removal of words from laws that are already on the books.
Words that are highlighted in yellow are
proposed additions, and words that are crossed out in
red are proposed removals.
The numbers with the § symbol before them are references to existing laws, and if you click on them they’ll take you to that part of the law on the state's website.
