Driving without a license; person may be placed under arrest if previously convicted of offense. (HB1695)

Introduced By

Del. Dave Albo (R-Springfield)

Progress

Introduced
X
Passed Committee
Passed House
Passed Senate
Signed by Governor
Became Law

Description

Driving without an operator's license. Provides that any person who drives without an operator's license may be placed under arrest, fingerprinted and the arrest reported to the Central Criminal Records Exchange if the general district court for the jurisdiction has approved arrest for the offense of driving without an operator's license. The bill also provides for administrative impoundment of the vehicle of a person who drives without an operator's license if he has been previously convicted of the offense. Amends § 19.2-390 (“Reports to be made by local law-enforcement officers, conservators of the peace, clerks of court, Secretary of the Commonwealth and Corrections officials to State Police; material submitted by other agencies.”), § 46.2-301.1 (“Administrative impoundment of motor vehicle for certain driving while license suspended or revoked offenses; judicial impoundment upon conviction; penalty for permitting violation with one\u2019s vehicle.”), § 46.2-936 (“Arrest for misdemeanor; release on summons and promise to appear; right to demand hearing immediately or within twenty-four hours; issuance of warrant on request of officer for violations of \u00a7\u00a7 46.2-301 and 46.2-302; refusal to promise to appear; violatio”), of the Code of Virginia. View Full Text »

Status

02/23/2009: Failed to Pass in Committee
View Bill's History

Comments

CG2 Consulting, tracking this bill in Photosynthesis, notes:

This is a VACOLAO legislative priority. VACOLAO opposes this bill which invites bias-based policing.

Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy, tracking this bill in Photosynthesis, notes:

The Virginia Interfaith Center opposes this bill.

Traci writes:

The problem with this proposed law and all others like it is that is unfairly punishes the driver. It will also use up police resources that could otherwise be used to deal with criminals.

I think I understand the frustration behind the idea of this bill, but it seems to jump past the problem just to create new problems.

Phil Storey writes:

This is a naked invitation to police to engage in discriminatory enforcement. Just say no!

Nonprofit NoVA, tracking this bill in Photosynthesis, notes:

Opposed.

David Wright writes:

Excuse me but how exactly does this invite "bias-based" policing or "discriminatory enforcement"? Are you implying that people of certain races or backgrounds are more likely to break the law and drive without a license ??

What this bill does is give cops out there risking their lives greater power to keep the streets clean of dangerous people who are not licensed to drive, particularly repeat offenders. I'm all for it.