Sex Offender & Crimes Against Minors Registry; provision in conviction order, sentencing order, etc. (HB1962)
Introduced By
Del. Bobby Mathieson (D-Virginia Beach) with support from co-patrons Del. Joe Bouchard (D-Virginia Beach), Del. Paula Miller (D-Norfolk), and Sen. Lynwood Lewis (D-Accomac)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✗ |
Passed Committee |
✓ |
Passed House |
☐ |
Passed Senate |
☐ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Sex Offender Registry. States that any provision in a conviction order, sentencing order, or other court order or plea agreement stating that a person is not required to register with the Sex Offender and Crimes Against Minors Registry is invalid and void ab initio if such provision is in conflict with the provisions of the Registry Act. Read the Bill »
Outcome
Bill Has Failed
History
Date | Action |
---|---|
01/13/2009 | Committee |
01/13/2009 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/14/09 098207824 |
01/13/2009 | Referred to Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety |
01/27/2009 | Assigned MPPS sub: #2 |
01/29/2009 | Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) |
01/30/2009 | Reported from Militia, Police and Public Safety with amendments (22-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/02/2009 | Read first time |
02/03/2009 | Read second time |
02/03/2009 | Committee amendments agreed to |
02/03/2009 | Engrossed by House as amended HB1962E |
02/03/2009 | Printed as engrossed 098207824-E |
02/04/2009 | Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (98-Y 0-N) |
02/04/2009 | VOTE: BLOCK VOTE PASSAGE (98-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/05/2009 | Constitutional reading dispensed |
02/05/2009 | Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice |
02/08/2009 | Impact statement from DPB (HB1962E) |
02/11/2009 | Assigned Courts sub: Criminal |
02/16/2009 | Subject matter referred to the Crime Commission pursuant to Senate Rule 30 (L) |
02/16/2009 | Passed by in Courts of Justice with letter (15-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/16/2009 | Subject matter referred to the Crime Commission pursuant to Senate Rule 20 (L) |
Comments
I look forward to the added names to the registries, more names more court challenges.
We wouldn't want judges to exercise any judicial discretion, would we?