Health insurance; mandated coverage for autism spectrum disorder. (SB1260)
Introduced By
Sen. Jill Holtzman Vogel (R-Winchester) with support from co-patron Sen. Richard Stuart (R-Westmoreland)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✗ |
Passed Committee |
☐ |
Passed House |
☐ |
Passed Senate |
☐ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Health insurance; mandated coverage for autism spectrum disorder. Requires health insurers, health care subscription plans, and health maintenance organizations to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of autism spectrum disorder in individuals under age 21. Coverage is subject to an annual maximum benefit of $36,000. Read the Bill »
Outcome
Bill Has Failed
History
Date | Action |
---|---|
01/14/2009 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/14/09 097809338 |
01/14/2009 | Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor |
01/26/2009 | Impact statement from SCC (SB1260) |
02/09/2009 | Reported from Commerce and Labor with substitute (15-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/09/2009 | Committee substitute printed 090186338-S1 |
02/09/2009 | Rereferred to Finance |
02/10/2009 | Reported from Finance with amendment (11-Y 5-N) (see vote tally) |
02/10/2009 | Read first time |
02/10/2009 | Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/10/2009 | Reading of substitute waived |
02/10/2009 | Committee substitute agreed to 090186338-S1 |
02/10/2009 | Reading of amendment waived |
02/10/2009 | Committee amendment rejected |
02/10/2009 | Motion to recommit to committee agreed to |
02/10/2009 | Recommitted to Finance |
02/11/2009 | Left in Finance |
02/12/2009 | Impact statement from SCC (SB1260S1) |
Video
This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 1 clip in all, totaling 8 minutes.
Comments
I am a licensed Physician Assistant who works in Roanoke VA. I know and am friends with several families with children in the Autism spectrum. I support this bill, however, I think the maximum benefit of $36,000 is too low. These children require intense therapy and medications to improve their quality of life so that they can have a chance grow into productive members of our society. Without medical coverage many families will not have the resources to help their kids during the crucial early years.
I am an unlicensed naturopath and I have seen this condition reversed with a proper course of nutritional intervention, which is much more efficient and less costly than medical intervention. There is much published on the underlying causes of autism and related disorders resulting from post-encephalitic syndrome caused by vaccines. Maybe if government would not mandate the cause, we wouldn’t find ourselves mandating that ALL of us pay for the resultant damage.
Basically there are 2 large populations in the US who have not vaccinated their kids AND have no autism in those children (1) the Amish in Lancaster PA and (2) patients of a group of doctors offices in Cook County IL. Here is the link:
http://www.upi.com/Health_News/2005/12/07/The_Age_of_Autism_A_pretty_big_secret/UPI-68291133982531/
So why should everyone have to pay for remediation (a.k.a. mandated coverage HB1588)?
Pat B,
I agree with your vaccine theory. However, for many of us, it is too late and the damage has already been done to our kids because the government has MANDATED the vaccines. So, if the government is mandating the cause of the autism, they should be helping out with paying for the treatment. The families should not be losing their homes over paying for expensive therapies like ABA which costs $50,000 or more per year and requires early intervention to be effective. This needs to be done in addition to the nutritional intervention to see the best results in these kids and to actually be able to cure them of their autism.
It should be mentioned that only one study that has ever found a link between mercury and autism, and it was thorough discredited last week. The three researchers were caught faking their study results, and are now likely to lose their medical licenses.
I am a mother with a son who now is 4 and was diagnosed with Autism at the age of 2. We have Blue cross Blue sheild our insurance plan is great for us and our other children, but as soon as Ethan was diagnosed with autism our medical bills became outragious because the testings and the treatments that were needed were not covered, non of it. I think that it is INSAIN for anyone to stand in the way of helping a child. My son didn't ask for this, if it was a stadium being built or a car company needing money(bailout) I guarantee everyone would approve that, but not helping a child which is priceless. Or h