Funeral services; alkaline hydrolysis prohibited, penalty. (HB379)
Introduced By
Del. Brenda Pogge (R-Williamsburg)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✗ |
Passed Committee |
☐ |
Passed House |
☐ |
Passed Senate |
☐ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Funeral services; alkaline hydrolysis prohibited; penalty. Prohibits any person from offering alkaline hydrolysis, which is the chemical process to dissolve human tissue, human remains, or a dead human body involving heat, high pressure, water, and potassium hydroxide, or an alternative alkaline solution. A violation is a Class 1 misdemeanor. Read the Bill »
Outcome
Bill Has Failed
History
Date | Action |
---|---|
01/10/2012 | Committee |
01/10/2012 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/12 12103627D |
01/10/2012 | Referred to Committee on Health, Welfare and Institutions |
01/17/2012 | Impact statement from DPB (HB379) |
01/24/2012 | Stricken from docket by Health, Welfare and Institutions |
Comments
This is a greener way to dispose of remains than cremation provides. It has been approved in at least 3 states. We don't prohibit cremation which has the same end result--why not allow a greener option?
I'm wondering why we'd ban this, too. I just read a bit about it on Wikipedia, and noticed that the Mayo Clinic uses this process to "cremate" donated bodies. That's a pretty strong endorsement for "resomation," as it's apparently called.
This bill is yet another example of why legislators should provide statements explaining why they've introduced each of their bills.