State Corporation Commission; eFile electronic registration system, etc. (HB168)
Introduced By
Del. David Ramadan (R-South Riding) with support from co-patrons Del. Terry Kilgore (R-Gate City), and Del. Danny Marshall (R-Danville)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✓ |
Passed Committee |
✓ |
Passed House |
✓ |
Passed Senate |
✓ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Clerk of the State Corporation Commission; secure online system; articles of dissolution; emergency. Requires the clerk of the State Corporation Commission, by July 1, 2014, to ensure that the Commission's eFile electronic registration system is secure. The system shall be deemed secure if it (i) provides a means to verify the identity of users; (ii) designates each user as having access with regard to one or more specified business entities; and (iii) allows users to access information regarding, and to make changes to records in the system affecting, only a business entity for which the user is designated. The measure also directs the clerk to ensure that any articles of dissolution of a stock or nonstock corporation that are filed in his office are signed by the chairman, a vice-chairman, the president, or any other of its officers authorized to act on behalf of the corporation who are listed as a director or principal officer on the corporation's most recently filed annual report. The bill has an emergency clause. Read the Bill »
Outcome
History
Date | Action |
---|---|
12/21/2013 | Prefiled and ordered printed with emergency clause; offered 01/08/14 |
12/21/2013 | Committee |
12/21/2013 | Prefiled and ordered printed with emergency clause; offered 01/08/14 14102419D |
12/21/2013 | Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor |
01/16/2014 | Assigned C & L sub: Subcommittee #1 |
01/28/2014 | Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) (10-Y 0-N) |
01/30/2014 | Reported from Commerce and Labor with substitute (19-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
01/30/2014 | Committee substitute printed 14104536D-H1 |
02/03/2014 | Read first time |
02/04/2014 | Impact statement from DPB (HB168H1) |
02/04/2014 | Read second time |
02/04/2014 | Committee substitute agreed to 14104536D-H1 |
02/04/2014 | Emergency clause deleted |
02/04/2014 | Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB168H1 |
02/05/2014 | Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (95-Y 0-N) |
02/05/2014 | Impact statement from DPB (HB168H1) |
02/05/2014 | VOTE: BLOCK VOTE PASSAGE (95-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/06/2014 | Constitutional reading dispensed |
02/06/2014 | Referred to Committee on Commerce and Labor |
02/24/2014 | Reported from Commerce and Labor (16-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/26/2014 | Constitutional reading dispensed (38-Y 0-N) |
02/27/2014 | Read third time |
02/27/2014 | Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N) |
03/04/2014 | Enrolled |
03/04/2014 | Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB168ER) |
03/04/2014 | Signed by Speaker |
03/05/2014 | Impact statement from DPB (HB168ER) |
03/07/2014 | Signed by President |
03/27/2014 | G Approved by Governor-Chapter 311 (effective 7/1/14) |
03/27/2014 | G Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0311) |
Comments
What a weird thing to introduce legislation about. It seems like a policy directive would be more appropriate. Are relations between the SCC and the rest of government so bad that we need a law passed to get the clerk to make sure that their system is secure?