Judges; mandatory retirement. (HB279)
Introduced By
Del. Dave Albo (R-Springfield)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✗ |
Passed Committee |
☐ |
Passed House |
☐ |
Passed Senate |
☐ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Mandatory judicial retirement. Increases mandatory judicial retirement to the expiration of a judge's term after the age of 70. However, the bill only becomes effective if the Judicial Performance Evaluation Program is funded and implemented. Read the Bill »
Outcome
Bill Has Failed
History
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 12/31/2013 | Committee |
| 12/31/2013 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/14 14100690D |
| 12/31/2013 | Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice |
| 01/10/2014 | Assigned Courts sub: Civil |
| 01/20/2014 | Impact statement from VRS (HB279) |
| 01/21/2014 | Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) (6-Y 3-N) |
| 01/21/2014 | Subcommittee recommends referring to Committee on Appropriations |
| 01/23/2014 | Impact statement from VRS (HB279) |
| 01/27/2014 | Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 7-N) (see vote tally) |
| 01/27/2014 | Committee substitute printed 14104276D-H1 |
| 01/27/2014 | Referred to Committee on Appropriations |
| 01/29/2014 | Assigned App. sub: Compensation and Retirement |
| 02/03/2014 | Impact statement from VRS (HB279H1) |
| 02/06/2014 | Subcommittee recommends laying on the table |
| 02/12/2014 | Left in Appropriations |
Comments
Keep age at 70, a good age to retire, need younger blood
that is upith the times.