Animal intake policy; animal control officers, etc., shall annually file with State Veterinarian. (HB476)

This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.

WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE REJECTED, THE QUESTION IS SHALL THE AMENDMENT BE AGREED TO? RECORD THEIR VOTE AYE; THOSE ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION WILL OPPOSED, NO. ALL THE NOS HAVE IT. THE AMENDMENT IS REJECTED. THE SENATOR FROM AUGUSTA, SENATOR HANGER. THANK YOU, MR. PRESIDENT. I MOVE THAT THE IF ANY COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE BE ADOPTED. President: THE QUESTION IS, SHALL THE SUBSTITUTE BE AGREED TO? ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION WILL RECORD THEIR VOTE AYE; THOSE OPPOSED, NO. THE AYES HAVE IT. THE SUBSTITUTE IS AGREED TO. THE SENATOR FROM AUGUSTUS. THE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE JUST CLARIFIED THE INTENT OF THE BILL AND WHAT THE BILL DOES IS REQUIRE RELEASING AGENCIES, ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS AND HUGH MAN INVESTIGATORS TO INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF THEIR ANIMAL INTAKE POLICY IN THEIR ANNUAL SHALL HOUSE BILL 476 PASS? REPORT. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION WILL RECORD THEIR VOTE AYE; THOSE OPPOSED, NO.

---

Del. Matt Fariss (R-Rustburg): FEVER. IT HAD A LITTLE FISCAL IMPACT OF $56,000 TO ADD ONE LINE ITEM ON THE APPLICATION TO THE STATE VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE, SO WHAT THE SENATE DID WAS THEY PUT ON AMENDMENT ON IT THAT SAID THAT YOU DIDN'T PUT YOUR INTAKE POLICY ON YOUR APPLICATION, YOU JUST MAILED A COPY INTO THE STATE VETERINARIAN. I HOPE IT WILL BE THE PLEASURE OF THE BODY TO ACCEPT THE SENATE AMENDMENTS.

[Unknown]: SHALL THE SENATE AMENDMENT BE AGREED TO?

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE CLERK WILL CLOSE THE ROLL.

---