Virginia Law Officers' Retirement System; adjusts annual supplement. (SB168)
Introduced By
Sen. Frank Ruff (R-Clarksville) with support from co-patrons Del. Margaret Ransone (R-Kinsale), and Del. Tommy Wright (R-Victoria)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✗ |
Passed Committee |
☐ |
Passed House |
☐ |
Passed Senate |
☐ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Virginia Law Officers' Retirement System; annual supplement. Adjusts the annual supplemental allowance under the Virginia Law Officers' Retirement System to continue until a member reaches Social Security retirement age. Current law would end the benefit at age 65. Read the Bill »
Status
02/02/2016: Failed to Pass in Committee
History
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 12/30/2015 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/13/16 16103153D |
| 12/30/2015 | Referred to Committee on Finance |
| 01/15/2016 | Impact statement from VRS (SB168) |
| 02/02/2016 | Continued to 2017 in Finance (15-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
Video
This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 1 clip in all, totaling 1 minute.
Transcript
This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.
Del. Dave LaRock (R-Loudoun): STOPPED SCHOOL BUSES RECORDED BY AN APPROVED SCHOOL BUS CAMERA MONITORING SYSTEM. AS AMENDED IN CONFERENCE IT WILL PROVIDE GREATER PROTECTION TO THE INDIVIDUAL ACCUSED OF VIOLATING THE STOP STOPPED SCHOOL BUS LAW. WE'VE ALSO ADDED LANGUAGE, NEW LANGUAGE IN THE SECOND CONFERENCE TO AVOID AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE OF THESE PROTECTIONS. PASSING THIS BILL WILL SUPPORT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY'S ONGOING COMMITMENT TO PROTECTING CHILDREN BOARDING AND EXITING A SCHOOL BUS. I HOPE WE WILL VOTE YES ON THIS CONFERENCE REPORT.
Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE GENTLEMAN FROM ALBEMARLE, MR. BELL.
Del. Rob Bell (R-Charlottesville): MR. SPEAKER, I'D LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE BILL.
Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE GENTLEMAN HAS THE FLOOR.
Del. Rob Bell (R-Charlottesville): MR. SPEAKER, THE GENTLEMAN WAS KIND ENOUGH TO LET US TAKE THIS BACK OUT OF THE FIRST CONFERENCE REPORT, AND WHAT SOMEONE DISCOVERED, ONCE THEY REVIEWED IT, WAS AN UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE, BUT COMPARED TO THE ORIGINAL HOUSE VERSION THAT PASSED ALREADY, THIS HAS ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS FOR A DRIVER THAT FIND THEMSELVES CAUGHT UP IN THE WEB WHEN THEY WERE NOT THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE OR IN FACT THEIR CAR HAS BEEN STOLEN, ADDITIONALLY, THE LAST MINUTE ADDITION WAS TO MAKE SURE WE DIDN'T LIMIT THE EVIDENCE THEY COULD PUT ON TO PROTECT THEMSELVES. IF YOU VOTED FOR THE ORIGINAL BILL, YOU SHOULD CERTAINLY VOTE FOR THIS ONE AND EVEN IF YOU DIDN'T VOTE FOR THAT ONE YOU MIGHT BE WILLING TO VOTE FOR THIS ONE. THANK YOU MR. SPEAKER.
[Unknown]: SHALL THE CONFERENCE REPORT BE ADOPTED?