Local stormwater utility; waiver of charges where stormwater retained on site. (SB468)

Introduced By

Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach)

Progress

Introduced
Passed Committee
Passed House
Passed Senate
Signed by Governor
Became Law

Description

Local stormwater utility; waiver of charges; retention of water on site. Provides that a locality establishing a stormwater utility or service charge system shall waive charges to any real property that retains its stormwater on site and thereby permanently produces no stormwater flow or pollutant loading. Amends § 15.2-2114, of the Code of Virginia. Read the Bill »

Status

03/01/2016: Passed the House

History

DateAction
01/12/2016Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/13/16 16101308D
01/12/2016Referred to Committee on Local Government
01/21/2016Impact statement from DPB (SB468)
02/02/2016Impact statement from DHCD (SB468)
02/09/2016Reported from Local Government with substitute (13-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/09/2016Committee substitute printed 16105352D-S1
02/11/2016Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/12/2016Read second time
02/12/2016Reading of substitute waived
02/12/2016Committee substitute agreed to 16105352D-S1
02/12/2016Passed by for the day
02/15/2016Read second time
02/15/2016Reading of amendments waived
02/15/2016Amendments by Senator Wagner agreed to
02/15/2016Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute with amendments SB468ES1
02/15/2016Printed as engrossed 16105352D-ES1
02/15/2016Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/15/2016Passed Senate (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/17/2016Placed on Calendar
02/17/2016Read first time
02/17/2016Referred to Committee on Counties, Cities and Towns
02/18/2016Assigned CC & T sub: Subcommittee #2
02/24/2016Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendment(s) (8-Y 0-N)
02/26/2016Reported from Counties, Cities and Towns with amendment (20-Y 2-N)
02/26/2016Reported from Counties, Cities and Towns with amendments (20-Y 2-N) (see vote tally)
02/29/2016Read second time
03/01/2016Read third time
03/01/2016Committee amendments agreed to
03/01/2016Engrossed by House as amended
03/01/2016Passed House with amendments (93-Y 1-N)
03/01/2016VOTE: PASSAGE (93-Y 1-N) (see vote tally)
03/03/2016House amendments rejected by Senate (10-Y 30-N) (see vote tally)
03/03/2016Reconsideration of House amendments agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
03/03/2016House amendments rejected by Senate (11-Y 29-N) (see vote tally)
03/04/2016House insisted on amendments
03/04/2016House requested conference committee
03/07/2016Senate acceded to request (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
03/07/2016Conferees appointed by Senate
03/07/2016Senators: Wagner, Stanley, Marsden
03/08/2016Delegates: Ingram, Hugo, Spruill
03/08/2016Conferees appointed by House
03/08/2016Delegates: Ingram, Hugo, Hester
03/10/2016C Amended by conference committee
03/10/2016Conference substitute printed 16106246D-S2
03/11/2016Passed by for the day
03/11/2016Reconsideration of Passed by for the day agreed to (38-Y 1-N) (see vote tally)
03/11/2016Passed by temporarily
03/11/2016Conference report rejected by Senate (0-Y 40-N) (see vote tally)
03/11/2016Senate requested second conference committee (39-Y 1-N) (see vote tally)
03/11/2016House acceded to request for second conference committee
03/11/2016Second conferees appointed by House
03/11/2016Delegates: Ingram, Hugo, Hester
03/11/2016Second conferees appointed by Senate
03/11/2016Senators: Wagner, Stanley, Marsden
03/11/2016Conference report agreed to by Senate (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
03/11/2016Conference report agreed to by House (90-Y 3-N)
03/11/2016VOTE: ADOPTION (90-Y 3-N) (see vote tally)

Video

This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 11 clips in all, totaling 20 minutes.

Transcript

This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.

SENATE BILL 436, REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL SERVICES. REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON FINANCE. SENATE BILL 468, REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT WITH SUBSTITUTE. THE SENIOR SENATOR FROM VASS BEACH, SENATOR WAGNER.

Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach): MR. PRESIDENT, I MOVE THE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE.

[Unknown]: THE QUESTION IS SHALL THE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE BE AGREED TO. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THOSE OPPOSED, NO. THE AYES HAVE IT. THE SUBSTITUTE IS AGREED TO.

Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach): SENATE BILL 535, REPORTED


[Unknown]: THE SENIOR SENATOR FROM VIRGINIA BEACH. SENATOR WAGNER.

Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach): I MOVE WE WAIVE THE READING OF THE FLOOR AMENDMENTS.

[Unknown]: THE QUESTION IS SHALL THE READING OF THE FLOOR AMENDMENTS BE WAIVED. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THOSE OPPOSED, NO. THE AYES HAVE IT. THE READING OF THE FLOOR AMENDMENT ARE WAIVED. THE SENIOR SENATOR.

Sen. Frank Wagner (R-Virginia Beach): I MOVE THAT WE TAKE THEM UP IN A BLOCK AND EXPLAIN THE FLOOR AMENDMENTS.

[Unknown]: THE SENATOR HAS THE FLOOR. WHAT SENATE BILL 468 DEALS WITH ENCOURAGING PUBLIC PRIVATE COOPERATION BETWEEN LOCALITIES AND THE PROVISION THAT MAKES IT CLEAR THAT RAILROAD TRACKS THAT HAVE PERVIOUS SURFACE CANNOT BE SUBJECT TO A STORM WATER FEE FOR THE PERVIOUS BEDS. IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN INTERPRETED AS TOO BROAD TO INCLUDE BUILDINGS AND EVERYTHING ELSE THE RAILROAD OWN. IT MAKES IT CLEAR FOCUSING ONLYON THE PER SHOUS BEDS. WITH THAT EXPLANATION I WOULD ASK THAT THE FLOOR AMENDMENTS BE AGREED TO. THE QUESTION IS SHALL THE FLOOR AMENDMENTS BE AGREED TO. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THOSE OPPOSED, NO. THE AYES HAVE IT. THE FLOOR AMENDMENTS ARE AGREED TO. MR. PRESIDENT, I NOW MOVE THAT THE BILL BE ENGROSSED AND ADVANCED TO THE THIRD READING. WE WILL DO THAT AT ANOTHER STEP. YOU ARE FINISHED. OH. SENATE BILL 277, REPORTED FROM COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION. SENATE BILL 458, REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND HEALTH WITH SUBSTITUTE. SENATE BILL 478, REPORTE THE SENIOR SENATOR FROM HENRICO, SENATOR McEACHIN.

Sen. Don McEachin (D-Richmond): MR. PRESIDENT, CAN THAT BE


[Unknown]: THE SENATOR FROM ROANOKE CITY, SENATOR EDWARDS. MR. PRESIDENT, I MOVE THAT WE CONCUR IN THE HOUSE AMENDMENT. WHAT THIS IS IS A TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO DELETE WORDS THAT PROVIDES WHERE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN A COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD AND MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY, PROVIDES THAT THE MEMORANDUM SHALL DESIGNATE A CONTACT PERSON TO BE NOTIFIED TO THE EXTENT AUTHORIZED BY STATE AND FEDERAL PRIVACY LAWS WHEN A STUDENT IS INVOLUNTARILY COMMITTED AND THE LANGUAGE INSERTS THAT SUCH
THE SENIOR SENATOR FROM VIRGINIA BEACH. MR. PRESIDENT, WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS AMENDMENT BE REJECTED, I MOVE THAT THE AMENDMENT BE CONCURRED WITH. THANK YOU, SENATOR. WITH THE RECOMMENDATION THAT THEY BE REJECTED, THE QUESTION IS SHALL THE AMENDMENTS BE AGREED TO. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION WILL RECORD THEIR VOTES AYE, THOSE OPPOSED NO. ARE THE SENATORS READY TO VOTE? HAVE ALL THE SENATORS VOTED? DO ANY SENATORS DESIRE TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE? THE CLERK WILL CLOSE THE ROLL. AYES 11, NOS 29. AYES 11, NOS 29. THE AMENDMENTS ARE REJECTED. SENATE BILL 120, THE HOUSE INSISTS ON ITS SUBSTITUTE AND
CONCUR WITH THE HOUSE SUBSTITUTE. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THOSE OPPOSED, NO. THE AYES HAVE IT. THE SENATE CONCURS WITH THE HOUSE SUBSTITUTE.

Sen. Emmett Hanger (R-Mount Solon): SENATE BILL 468. THE HOUSE IN CONSISTS AND REQUESTS A COMMITTEE OF CONFERENCE FROM I MOVE WE ACEDE TO THE REQUEST.

[Unknown]: ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION W. ARE THE SENATORS READY TO VOTE? HAVE ALL THE SENATORS VOTED? DO ANY SENATORS DESIRE TO CH ANGE THEIR VOTE? THE CLERK WILL CLOSE THE ROLL.
THANK YOU. PROCEED TO THE HOUSE POSITION AS IT LEFT THE HOUSE WHEN IT PASSED THE HOUSE 98-0. AND WHAT IT DOES, IT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANYTHING -- IT DOES NOT INCLUDE ANYTHING ABOUT RAILROADS AT ALL. IT SIMPLY ALLOWS LOCALITIES TO ESTABLISH PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS TO TREAT STORM WATER RUNOFF. IT WILL BE THE PLEASURE OF THE HOUSE TO ACCEPT THE REPORT. GENTLEMAN FROM FAIRFAX. MR. BULOVA.

Del. David Bulova (D-Fairfax): THANK YOU. I HAD THIS REALLY GOOD SPEECH LAID OUT FOR THIS. I WON'T READ IT BECAUSE IT'S A GREAT CONFERENCE REPORT. I HOPE EVERYBODY WILL VOTE YES.

[Unknown]: SHALL THE CONFERENCE REPORT