Judge; nomination for election to Court of Appeals. (SR43)

Introduced By

Sen. Ryan McDougle (R-Mechanicsville)

Progress

Introduced
Passed Committee
Passed House
Passed Senate
Signed by Governor
Became Law

Description

Nominating a person to be elected to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Read the Bill »

Outcome

Bill Has Failed

History

DateAction
02/09/2016Presented and ordered printed 16105403D
02/09/2016Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
02/09/2016Reported from Courts of Justice (9-Y 6-N) (see vote tally)
02/09/2016Read first time
02/10/2016Read second time
02/10/2016Motion to recommit to committee agreed to
02/10/2016Recommitted to Courts of Justice
03/04/2016Reported from Courts of Justice with amendment (8-Y 5-N) (see vote tally)
03/04/2016Read second time
03/04/2016Reading of amendment waived
03/04/2016Committee amendment agreed to
03/04/2016Engrossed by Senate as amended SR43E
03/04/2016Printed as engrossed 16105403D-E
03/07/2016Passed by for the day
03/08/2016Passed by temporarily
03/08/2016Passed by for the day
03/09/2016Passed by for the day
03/10/2016Passed by temporarily
03/10/2016Passed by for the day
03/11/2016Passed by temporarily
03/11/2016Passed by for the day
03/11/2016No further action taken
03/11/2016Failed to pass in Senate

Video

This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 5 clips in all, totaling 2 minutes.

Transcript

This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.

SENATE RESOLUTION 43, NOMINATING A PERSON TO BE ELECTED TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE FOR COURTS OF JUSTICE WITH AMES. DID WITH AMENDMENT. THE SENATOR FROM HANOVER, SENATOR McDOUGLE.

Sen. Ryan McDougle (R-Mechanicsville): I MOVE THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENT BE AGREED TO.

[Unknown]: THE QUESTION IS SHALL THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENT BE AGREED TO. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENT IS WILL SAY AYE, THOSE OPPOSED NO. AGREED TO. THE SENATOR FROM HANOVER. MR. PRESIDENT, I MOVE THE RESOLUTION BE ENGROSSED AND ADVANCED TO ITS THIRD READING. THE QUESTION IS SHALL THE RESOLUTION BE ENGROSSED AND ADVANCED TO ITS THIRD READING. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION WILL SAY AYE, THOSE OPPOSED NO. THE VAES HAVE IT. THE RESOLUTION IS ENGROSSED AND

Duplicate Bills

The following bills are identical to this one: SR25.