Career and technical education; notification by school board to students and parents of programs. (HB1552)

Introduced By

Del. David Bulova (D-Fairfax) with support from co-patron Del. Jim LeMunyon (R-Oak Hill)

Progress

Introduced
Passed Committee
Passed House
Passed Senate
Signed by Governor
Became Law

Description

Local school boards; student and parent notification; career and technical education programs. Requires each local school board to implement a plan to notify students and their parents of the availability of career and technical education programs. Amends § 22.1-253.13:1, of the Code of Virginia. Read the Bill »

Outcome

Bill Has Passed

History

DateAction
12/29/2016Committee
12/29/2016Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/17 17102021D
12/29/2016Referred to Committee on Education
01/12/2017Impact statement from DPB (HB1552)
01/13/2017Assigned Education sub: Elementary and Secondary Education
01/18/2017Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)
01/23/2017Reported from Education with substitute (20-Y 1-N) (see vote tally)
01/23/2017Committee substitute printed 17104342D-H1
01/24/2017Read first time
01/25/2017Read second time
01/25/2017Committee substitute agreed to 17104342D-H1
01/25/2017Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB1552H1
01/26/2017Read third time and passed House (98-Y 0-N)
01/26/2017VOTE: PASSAGE (98-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
01/27/2017Constitutional reading dispensed
01/27/2017Referred to Committee on Education and Health
02/03/2017Impact statement from DPB (HB1552H1)
02/09/2017Reported from Education and Health (15-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/10/2017Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/13/2017Read third time
02/13/2017Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/15/2017Enrolled
02/15/2017Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB1552ER)
02/15/2017Impact statement from DPB (HB1552ER)
02/15/2017Signed by Speaker
02/17/2017Signed by President
02/17/2017Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on 2/17/17
02/17/2017G Governor's Action Deadline Midnight, February 24, 2017
02/20/2017G Approved by Governor-Chapter 100 (effective 7/1/17)
02/20/2017G Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0100)

Video

This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 1 clip in all, totaling 2 minutes.

Transcript

This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.



Del. Marcus Simon (D-Falls Church): FOR THAT, MEMBERS OF THE BODY, BUT THIS IS NOT -- TAKING A VOTE AGAINST THIS BILL IS TAKING A VOTE AGAINST A REALLY BAD POLICY. IT'S NOT AN ANTI-MILITARY VOTE. THIS IS TREATING YOUR SEAT -- I TALKED ABOUT THIS EARLIER IN THE MORNING HOUR. THIS IS TREATING YOUR SEAT ON THE SCHOOL BOARD LIKE IT'S SOME SORT OF PROPERTY RIGHT. WE'RE TREATING IT LIKE YOU CAN GIVE SOMEBODY A POWER OF ATTORNEY TO MANAGE YOUR HOUSE OR MANAGE YOUR AFFAIRS OR MANAGE YOUR BANK ACCOUNTS.

[Unknown]: MR. SPEAKER, WOULD THE GENTLEMAN YIELD FOR A QUESTION? I WOULD NOT YIELD. I AM NOT FINISHED. GENTLEMAN DECLINES TO YIELD. I'LL ASK IT AGAIN LATER. THE GENTLEMAN MAY CONTINUE. THIS IS A BAD POLICY, IT'S BAD IDEA FOR THE REASON I WAS IN THE MIDDLE OF SAYING. IT TREATS IT LIKE A PROPERTY RIGHT, LIKE SOAK YOU OWN, SOMEBODY YOU CAN GIVE SOMEBODY A POWER OF ATTORNEY WHILE YOU'RE GONE AND YOU STEP BACK IN. THAT'S NOT WHAT ELECTED OFFICE IS ABOUT. THAT'S NOT WHAT PEOPLE ELECT YOU TO DO. THEY ELECT YOU TO SERVE IN THE OFFICE BECAUSE IT'S YOU, RIGHT? WHEN YOU'RE A FIDUCIARY OF A TRUST -- I'M IN THE REAL ESTATE TITLE BUSINESS. WE DO THIS ALL THE TIME. PEOPLE COME TO ME AND SAY, I NEED A POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR SOMEBODY TO DO A REFINANCE FOR ME FOR MY PROPERTY THAT I DID HELD A LIVING TRUST. I EXPLAIN, YOU CAN'T DO THAT BECAUSE YOU DON'T OWN THE PROPERTY ANYMORE, YOU'RE A TRUSTEE OF A TRUST. YOU'RE A FIDUCIARY. YOU WERE APPOINTED AS A FIDUCIARY BECAUSE THEY TRUSTED YOU TO MANAGE THEIR PROPERTY, NOT SOMEBODY ELSE YOU MIGHT DESIGNATE IT TO. THIS IS A POSITION OF TRUST, IT'S A POSITION THAT YOU ARE SPECIFICALLY TASKED TO DO AND IT DOES NOT INCLUDE THE POWER TO DELEGATE THAT TO SOMEBODY ELSE JUST BECAUSE YOU THINK THEY'D DO A GOOD JOB. THIS IS A BAD POLICY, HAS