Condemnation powers and proceedings; notice to owner or tenant. (HB2024)
Introduced By
Del. Nick Freitas (R-Culpeper)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✓ |
Passed Committee |
✓ |
Passed House |
✓ |
Passed Senate |
✓ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Condemnation powers and proceedings; imminent threat to public health, safety, and welfare required. Provides that "quick take" condemnation proceedings, the procedure for which is governed by Chapter 3 ( 25.1-300 et seq.) of Title 25.1 (Transferring Defeasible Title by Certificate), are available for use only when a court determines that the use of such procedure is necessary to protect against an imminent threat to public health, safety, and welfare. The bill further allows for entities allowed to exercise eminent domain only in the manner provided for by Chapter 3 of Title 25.1 to alternatively use the procedures outlined by Chapter 2 ( 25.1-200 et seq.) of Title 25.1 (Condemnation Procedures). Read the Bill »
Outcome
History
Date | Action |
---|---|
01/10/2017 | Committee |
01/10/2017 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/17 17101207D |
01/10/2017 | Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice |
01/16/2017 | Assigned Courts sub: Civil Law |
01/25/2017 | Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N) |
01/27/2017 | Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (21-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
01/27/2017 | Committee substitute printed 17104805D-H1 |
01/31/2017 | Read first time |
02/01/2017 | Read second time |
02/01/2017 | Committee substitute agreed to 17104805D-H1 |
02/01/2017 | Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB2024H1 |
02/02/2017 | Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (95-Y 0-N) |
02/02/2017 | VOTE: BLOCK VOTE PASSAGE (95-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/03/2017 | Constitutional reading dispensed |
02/03/2017 | Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice |
02/08/2017 | Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (14-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/08/2017 | Committee substitute printed 17105301D-S1 |
02/10/2017 | Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/13/2017 | Read third time |
02/13/2017 | Reading of substitute waived |
02/13/2017 | Committee substitute agreed to 17105301D-S1 |
02/13/2017 | Passed by for the day |
02/14/2017 | Read third time |
02/14/2017 | Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute HB2024S1 |
02/14/2017 | Passed Senate with substitute (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/15/2017 | Impact statement from DPB (HB2024S1) |
02/16/2017 | Placed on Calendar |
02/16/2017 | Senate substitute rejected by House 17105301D-S1 (0-Y 97-N) |
02/16/2017 | VOTE: REJECTED (0-Y 97-N) (see vote tally) |
02/20/2017 | Senate insisted on substitute (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/20/2017 | Senate requested conference committee |
02/21/2017 | House acceded to request |
02/22/2017 | Conferees appointed by Senate |
02/22/2017 | Senators: Obenshain, Petersen, Peake |
02/23/2017 | Conferees appointed by House |
02/23/2017 | Delegates: Freitas, Habeeb, Hope |
02/24/2017 | C Amended by conference committee |
02/24/2017 | Conference report agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/24/2017 | Conference report agreed to by House (94-Y 0-N) |
02/24/2017 | VOTE: ADOPTION (94-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
03/07/2017 | Enrolled |
03/07/2017 | Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB2024ER) |
03/07/2017 | Signed by Speaker |
03/10/2017 | Signed by President |
03/13/2017 | Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on 3/13/17 |
03/13/2017 | G Governor's Action Deadline Midnight, March 27, 2017 |
03/16/2017 | G Approved by Governor-Chapter 563 (effective 7/1/17) |
03/16/2017 | G Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0563) |
03/28/2017 | Impact statement from DPB (HB2024ER) |
Video
This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 3 clips in all, totaling 2 minutes.
Transcript
This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.
THIS IS A YEAR OR YEAR AND A HALF AFTER THE JUDGE HAS DECIDED THAT THERE IS ENOUGH EVIDENCE FOR THEIR GUILT. AND THEN AT THAT POINT THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO APPEAL AND HAVE THE WHOLE THING START OVER AGAIN. AND THIS BILL WOULD STOP THAT IT WOULD SAY IF YOU DON'T LIKE PROCESS. YOUR TREATMENT THAT YOU GOT, IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE JUDGE'S DECISION, IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE IN THE PROGRAM YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE AND YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL JUST LIKE ANY OTHER CASE BUT TEN DAYS TO DECIDE YOU WANT TO BACK OUT. AND THAT WOULD GIVE YOU ANOTHER TEN DAYS TO APPEAL. PUT YOU BACK WHERE YOU STARTED. IF YOU DON'T WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM YOU DON'T HAVE TO. THE BILL SAYS THAT. BUT IT ALSO SAYS THAT YOU DON'T GET TO HAVE YOUR CAKE AND EAT IT, TOO. AND I WOULD THEREFORE MOVE THAT