Alcoholic beverage control; creates walking tour permit. (SB1108)
Introduced By
Sen. Glen Sturtevant (R-Midlothian)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✓ |
Passed Committee |
✓ |
Passed House |
✓ |
Passed Senate |
✓ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Alcoholic beverage control; walking tour permit. Creates a new permit that allows tour companies guiding individuals for compensation on a walking tour to licensed retail establishments to collect as one fee from tour participants (i) the licensee's fee for the alcoholic beverages served as part of the tour, (ii) a fee for any food offered as part of the tour, and (iii) a fee for the walking tour service. The bill requires the tour company to remit to the licensee any fee collected for the alcoholic beverages served as part of the tour. Read the Bill »
Outcome
History
Date | Action |
---|---|
01/09/2017 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/11/17 17101003D |
01/09/2017 | Referred to Committee on Rehabilitation and Social Services |
01/20/2017 | Reported from Rehabilitation and Social Services (13-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
01/23/2017 | Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
01/24/2017 | Read second time and engrossed |
01/25/2017 | Read third time and passed Senate (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
01/31/2017 | Placed on Calendar |
01/31/2017 | Read first time |
01/31/2017 | Referred to Committee on General Laws |
02/01/2017 | Impact statement from DPB (SB1108) |
02/06/2017 | Assigned GL sub: Subcommittee #3 |
02/14/2017 | Subcommittee recommends reporting with amendments (6-Y 1-N) |
02/16/2017 | Reported from General Laws with substitute (18-Y 1-N) (see vote tally) |
02/16/2017 | Committee substitute printed 17105641D-H1 |
02/17/2017 | Impact statement from DPB (SB1108H1) |
02/20/2017 | Read second time |
02/21/2017 | Read third time |
02/21/2017 | Committee substitute agreed to 17105641D-H1 |
02/21/2017 | Engrossed by House - committee substitute SB1108H1 |
02/21/2017 | Passed House with substitute (84-Y 12-N) |
02/21/2017 | VOTE: PASSAGE (84-Y 12-N) (see vote tally) |
02/22/2017 | House substitute agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
02/22/2017 | Title replaced 17105641D-H1 |
03/07/2017 | Enrolled |
03/07/2017 | Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB1108ER) |
03/07/2017 | Signed by Speaker |
03/09/2017 | Impact statement from DPB (SB1108ER) |
03/10/2017 | Signed by President |
03/13/2017 | Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on 3/13/17 |
03/13/2017 | G Governor's Action Deadline Midnight, March 27, 2017 |
03/20/2017 | G Approved by Governor-Chapter 675 (effective 7/1/17) |
03/20/2017 | G Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0675) |
Video
This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 1 clip in all, totaling 1 minute.
Transcript
This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.
Del. Mark Levine (D-Alexandria): IN OTHER STATES, PEOPLE IN OTHER STATES CAN PASS LAWS IN THEIR STATES THAT ENCOURAGE THEIR CITIZENS TO BREAK THE LAW IN VIRGINIA. I DON'T WANT TO SEE A WAR BETWEEN THE STATES, I DON'T THINK THAT RETALIATION IS A GOOD THING. THE THIRD THING, AND THIS IS KIND OF A LEGALISTIC POINT, BUT THE LAW SAYS NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW. NOW, WE PASSED SOMETHING WITH THAT LANGUAGE YESTERDAY, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, AND WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT, IT'S LIKE A SUPER LAW. IT MEANS THIS LAW MATTERS MORE THAN EVERY OTHER LAW IN THE BOOKS, AND LOGICALLY, YOU CAN'T DO THAT MORE THAN ONCE. I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENS WHEN TWO BILLS SAY NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER LAW, WHEN THE TWO LAWS CONFRONT EACH OTHER. I GUESS A JUDGE WILL HAVE TO WORK IT OUT. I THINK IT'S BADLY DRAFTED. I ENCOURAGE THE MEMBERS TO OPPOSE THE BILL. THANK YOU MR. SPEAKER.
Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE GENTLEMAN FROM PRINCE WILLIAM, MR. LINGAMFELTER.
Del. Scott Lingamfelter (R-Woodbridge): YES, MR. SPEAKER, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SHARE WITH THE BODY THE GENESIS OF THIS BILL. THE PATRON OF THE BILL FOR SEVERAL YEARS HAS ATTEMPTED TO ADDRESS A SERIOUS PROBLEM WHICH DOESN'T HARM LAW ENFORCEMENT, BUT IT DOES HARM SOMEONE. IT HARMS LAW ASIDING CITIZENS