Applicant Fingerprint Database; Federal Bureau of Investigation records. (SB1506)

Introduced By

Sen. John Cosgrove (R-Chesapeake)

Progress

Introduced
Passed Committee
Passed House
Passed Senate
Signed by Governor
Became Law

Description

Applicant Fingerprint Database; Federal Bureau of Investigation records. Authorizes the Department of State Police to submit fingerprints and accompanying records to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to be advised through the FBI's Next Generation Identification Rap Back service when an individual subject to a criminal background check is arrested for, or convicted of, a criminal offense not reported to the Department which would disqualify that individual from licensure, certification, employment, or volunteer service with that entity. Read the Bill »

Outcome

Bill Has Passed

History

DateAction
01/18/2017Presented and ordered printed 17101608D
01/18/2017Referred to Committee on Transportation
01/25/2017Rereferred from Transportation (10-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
01/25/2017Rereferred to Courts of Justice
01/30/2017Impact statement from DPB (SB1506)
02/01/2017Reported from Courts of Justice (10-Y 3-N) (see vote tally)
02/03/2017Constitutional reading dispensed (39-Y 0-N) (see vote tally)
02/06/2017Read second time and engrossed
02/07/2017Read third time and passed Senate (32-Y 8-N) (see vote tally)
02/09/2017Placed on Calendar
02/09/2017Read first time
02/09/2017Referred to Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety
02/17/2017Reported from Militia, Police and Public Safety (18-Y 4-N) (see vote tally)
02/20/2017Read second time
02/21/2017Read third time
02/21/2017Passed House (87-Y 4-N)
02/21/2017VOTE: PASSAGE (87-Y 4-N) (see vote tally)
02/24/2017Enrolled
02/24/2017Bill text as passed Senate and House (SB1506ER)
02/24/2017Signed by President
02/24/2017Signed by Speaker
02/28/2017Impact statement from DPB (SB1506ER)
02/28/2017Enrolled Bill Communicated to Governor on 2/28/17
02/28/2017G Governor's Action Deadline Midnight, March 27, 2017
03/16/2017G Approved by Governor-Chapter 524 (effective 7/1/17)
03/16/2017G Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0524)

Video

This bill was discussed on the floor of the General Assembly. Below is all of the video that we have of that discussion, 2 clips in all, totaling 6 minutes.

Transcript

This is a transcript of the video clips in which this bill is discussed.



Sen. Dick Saslaw (D-Springfield): ADVISES THE GOVERNMENT ON -- THROUGH THE CIT THROUGH COLLEGES, WHERE TO INVEST SMALL AMOUNTS OF POINT FOR RESEARCH. -- OF MONEY FOR RESEARCH. THE MONIES THAT ARE COVERED BY THE BUDGET. WE DID REDUCE SOME MONEY, BUT THAT WAS IN A -- IT WAS 12.2 MILLION, BUT DOWN TO -- IT WAS 22 MILLION ORIGINALLY AND NOW IT'S 12.2. IT STAYED THAT, BUT IT WILL COVER THIS AND LIKE I SAID, THE TWO MAJOR COMPONENTS ARE, ONE, THE ROADMAP PART WHICH IS JUST EXPLAINED, AND THE OTHER IS THE, UNDER FOIA, COMPANIES THAT SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR GRANTS, IF THEY DON'T GET THE GRANT, THEN THEIR TRADE SECRETS ARE NOT SUBJECT TO FOIA. OBVIOUS IF THEY DO GET THE GRANTS, WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING DOES BECOME PART OF FOIA. SO WITH THAT, I WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD PASS THE BILL.

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THANK YOU, SENATOR. THE QUESTION IS SHALL SENATE BILL 1371 PASS. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION WILL RECORD THEIR VOTES AYE, THOSE OPPOSED NO. ARE THE SENATORS READY TO VOTE? HAVE ALL THE SENATORS VOTED? DO ANY SENATORS DESIRE TO CHANGE THEIR VOTE? THE CLERK WILL CLOSE THE ROLL.

Sen. Dick Saslaw (D-Springfield): AYES 39, NOS 1.

[Unknown]: AYES 39, NOS 1. THE BILL PASSES. SENATE BILL 1398, A BILL RELATING TO COAL COMBUSTION RESIDUALS UNIT, CLOSURE PERMIT,


Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): WILLIAM, MR. LINGAMFELTER.

Del. Scott Lingamfelter (R-Woodbridge): I MOVE THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENT.

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): QUESTION IS ON ADOPTION OF THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENT, AS MANY AS FAVOR THAT MOTION WILL SAY AYE, THOSE OPPOSED, NO. THE AMENDMENT IS AGREED TO. THE GENTLEMAN FROM PRINCE WILLIAM.

Del. Scott Lingamfelter (R-Woodbridge): THANK YOU MR. SPEAKER. THE AMENDMENT SIMPLY ADDS THE WORD VALID TO THE SECTION HERE, VALID I.D., SO THAT CLARIFIES THAT. THIS BILL NOW AMENDED PROVIDES THAT A MEMBER OF THE VIRGINIA NATIONAL GUARD, THE VIRGINIA DEFENSE FORCE, THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES, THE ARMED FORCES RESERVES OF THE UNITED STATES, IN A NONDUTY STATUS, MAY CARRY A CONCEALED WEAPON WHEREVER SUCH MEMBER MAY TRAVEL IN THE COMMONWEALTH PROVIDED THAT SUCH MEMBER IS CARRYING HIS MILITARY, HIS VALID MILITARY IDENTIFICATION. I MOVE WE PASS THE BILL.

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE GENTLEMAN FROM CHARLOTTESVILLE, MR. TOSCANO.

Del. David Toscano (D-Charlottesville): THANK YOU MR. SPEAKER, WILL THE GENTLEMAN YIELD?

[Unknown]: WILL THE GENTLEMAN YIELD?

Del. David Toscano (D-Charlottesville): I YIELD.

[Unknown]: THE GENTLEMAN YIELDS. THANK YOU MR. SPEAKER. I WOULD ASK THE GENTLEMAN, THERE ARE A LOT OF FOLKS HERE WHO ARE PERHAPS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE VIRGINIA DEFENSE FORCE, AND, YOU KNOW, FRANKLY, EVERY TIME THIS COMES UP, I HAVE TO GO BACK TO THE WEBSITE AND CHECK OUT BUT TODAY, WHEN I WENT, I WHAT THEY DO. LOOKED AT IT AND SAID THAT UNDER THE CODE, THE VIRGINIA DEFENSE FORCE, QUOTE, SHALL NOT BE ARMED WITH FIREARMS DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTY. AND AM I READING THAT WRONG? BECAUSE IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THIS BILL WOULD ARM THEM ESSENTIALLY WHEN THEY ARE IN NONDUTY STATUS WHEN THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO BE ARMED WHEN WE WERE ON DUTY STATUS UNLESS THE GOVERNOR AUTHORIZED IT. MR. SPEAKER, I RESPOND TO THE GENTLEMAN THAT THIS BILL DOES NOT TOUCH THE PROHIBITION THAT HE SPOKE TO. IT SIMPLY TALKS ABOUT THEIR NONDUTY STATUS. MR. SPEAKER, WILL THE GENTLEMAN YIELD? WILL THE GENTLEMAN YIELD? I YIELD. THE GENTLEMAN YIELDS. I WOULD ASK THE GENTLEMAN AGAIN, IS IT NOT THE CASE THAT THE VIRGINIA DEFENSE FORCE, ABSENT A GOVERNOR'S INSTRUCTION, SHALL NOT BE ARMED WITH FIREARMS DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTY, IS THAT RIGHT? MR. SPEAKER, I WOULD RESPOND TO THE GENTLEMAN THAT I AM NOT PERSONALLY FAMILIAR WITH THE SECTION THAT HE IS REFERRING TO, AND IT MAY WELL BE THAT THAT SECTION IS REFERRING TO ARMED WITH MILITARY WEAPONS AS OPPOSED TO A PERSONAL WEAPON. IF THE GENTLEMAN WOULD LIKE ME TO TAKE THIS BY, WE CAN CERTAINLY LOOK INTO THAT. YES, MR. SPEAKER, MOTION --

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): WITHOUT OBJECTION --

[Unknown]: I MOVE WE TAKE THE BILL BY.

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): WITHOUT OBJECTION, SENATE BILL 1362, BY FOR THE DAY.

[Unknown]: CONTINUING ON PAGE 23 OF THE PRINTED CALENDAR, SENATE BILL 1387, A BILL TO AMEND AND REENACT A SECTION OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA RELATING TO THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT AND REVIEW COMMISSION, OPERATIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS REVIEWS, REPORT, THE BILL WAS REPORTED FROM THE COMMITTEE ON RULES WITH AN AMENDMENT.

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE GENTLEMAN FROM AUGUSTA, MR. LANDIS.

[Unknown]: THANK YOU MR. SPEAKER. MR. SPEAKER, PHYSICAL, I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE THE RULES COMMITTEE AMENDMENT TO SENATE BILL 1387.

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE QUESTION IS ON ADOPTION OF THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENT. AS MANY AS FAVOR THAT MOTION WILL SAY AYE, THOSE OPPOSED, NO. THE COMMITTEE AMENDMENT IS AGREED TO. THE GENTLEMAN FROM AUGUSTA.

[Unknown]: THANK YOU MR. SPEAKER. MR. SPEAKER, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE HOUSE, SENATE BILL 1387 WOULD AUTHORIZE JLARC TO ESTABLISH AN OPERATIONAL AND PROGRAMMATIC EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT OF STATE AGENCIES UNDER A CONTRACT WITH UNITED STATES-BASED PRIVATE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRM WITH EXPERIENCE IN CONDUCTING STATEWIDE PERFORMANCE REVIEWS. MR. SPEAKER, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE HOUSE, THE AMENDMENT THAT THE RULES COMMITTEE ADOPTED SIMPLY REMOVES LANGUAGE RELATED TO HOW IT WOULD COINCIDE RELATED TO THE BUDGET. WE DID NOT FEEL THAT WAS NECESSARY. THE BILL ALSO PROVIDES CERTAIN REQUIRED TERMS FOR THE CONTRACT AND REQUIRES THE COMMISSION TO REPORT ANNUALLY BY DECEMBER 1ST RELATED TO THESE REVIEWS. MR. SPEAKER, I MOVE THE BILL PASS. SHALL THE BILL PASS?

Del. Bill Howell (R-Fredericksburg): THE CLERK WILL CLOSE THE ROLL.