Protective orders; prohibited contact, remote control of appliance, etc., by electronic device. (HB159)
Introduced By
Del. Kaye Kory (D-Falls Church) with support from co-patron Del. Ibraheem Samirah (D-Herndon)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✗ |
Passed Committee |
☐ |
Passed House |
☐ |
Passed Senate |
☐ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Protective orders; prohibited contact; remote control of appliance, utility, or device by electronic device. Clarifies that a court entering a protective order may, as a condition of such protective order, prohibit the respondent from using any electronic device to remotely control any appliance, utility, or device located on or within the petitioner's residence or the curtilage thereof. Read the Bill »
Outcome
Bill Has Failed
History
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| 12/21/2019 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 |
| 12/21/2019 | Committee |
| 12/21/2019 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20104134D |
| 12/21/2019 | Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice |
| 12/27/2019 | Impact statement from VCSC (HB159) |
| 01/27/2020 | Impact statement from DPB (HB159) |
| 02/04/2020 | Assigned Courts sub: Criminal |
| 02/06/2020 | Subcommittee recommends continuing to 2021 |
| 02/07/2020 | Continued to 2021 in Courts of Justice |
| 02/11/2020 | Left in Courts of Justice |
Comments
I get 2 brother that’s lock up in I don’t think that they need all the time that they give them. It’s they first time in the jail in they got 20 years I don’t think that was fair for them to get all them years with out Parole.