Exhaust systems; regulation of noise from vehicle on a highway, etc. (HB632)
Introduced By
Del. Betsy Carr (D-Richmond) with support from co-patron Del. Karrie Delaney (D-Centreville)
Progress
✓ |
Introduced |
✓ |
Passed Committee |
✓ |
Passed House |
✓ |
Passed Senate |
✓ |
Signed by Governor |
☐ |
Became Law |
Description
Exhaust systems; excessive noise. Makes certain secondary offenses related to loud exhaust systems that are not in good working order primary offenses and exempts local ordinances related to such exhaust systems from the prohibition on law-enforcement officers stopping a vehicle for a violation of a local ordinance unless it is a jailable offense. Read the Bill »
Outcome
Bill Has Passed
History
Date | Action |
---|---|
01/11/2022 | Committee |
01/11/2022 | Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22100082D |
01/11/2022 | Referred to Committee on Transportation |
01/19/2022 | Assigned Transportation sub: Subcommittee #3 Highway Safety and Policy |
01/19/2022 | Impact statement from DPB (HB632) |
01/24/2022 | Assigned Transportation sub: Subcommittee #4 Innovations (Ad Hoc) |
02/03/2022 | House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered |
02/03/2022 | Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (6-Y 0-N) |
02/08/2022 | House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered |
02/08/2022 | Reported from Transportation with substitute (20-Y 1-N) (see vote tally) |
02/08/2022 | Committee substitute printed 22105730D-H1 |
02/10/2022 | Impact statement from DPB (HB632H1) |
02/10/2022 | Read first time |
02/11/2022 | Read second time |
02/11/2022 | Committee substitute agreed to 22105730D-H1 |
02/11/2022 | Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB632H1 |
02/14/2022 | Read third time and passed House (71-Y 28-N) |
02/14/2022 | VOTE: Passage (71-Y 28-N) (see vote tally) |
02/16/2022 | Constitutional reading dispensed |
02/16/2022 | Referred to Committee on Transportation |
03/03/2022 | Senate committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered |
03/03/2022 | Reported from Transportation with substitute (12-Y 2-N) (see vote tally) |
03/03/2022 | Committee substitute printed 22107439D-S1 |
03/07/2022 | Constitutional reading dispensed (38-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
03/08/2022 | Impact statement from DPB (HB632S1) |
03/08/2022 | Read third time |
03/08/2022 | Reading of substitute waived |
03/08/2022 | Committee substitute agreed to 22107439D-S1 |
03/08/2022 | Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute HB632S1 |
03/08/2022 | Passed Senate with substitute (28-Y 11-N) (see vote tally) |
03/09/2022 | Senate substitute rejected by House 22107439D-S1 (1-Y 97-N) |
03/09/2022 | VOTE: Adoption (1-Y 97-N) (see vote tally) |
03/10/2022 | Senate insisted on substitute (40-Y 0-N) (see vote tally) |
03/10/2022 | Senate requested conference committee |
03/10/2022 | House acceded to request |
03/10/2022 | Conferees appointed by House |
03/10/2022 | Delegates: Carr, Austin, Wiley |
03/10/2022 | Conferees appointed by Senate |
03/10/2022 | Senators: Marsden, Favola, Newman |
03/11/2022 | C Amended by conference committee |
03/11/2022 | Conference substitute printed 22107726D-H2 |
03/11/2022 | Passed by temporarily |
03/11/2022 | Conference report agreed to by House (79-Y 18-N) |
03/11/2022 | VOTE: Adoption (79-Y 18-N) (see vote tally) |
03/11/2022 | Conference report agreed to by Senate (32-Y 8-N) (see vote tally) |
03/14/2022 | Impact statement from DPB (HB632H2) |
03/21/2022 | Enrolled |
03/21/2022 | Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB632ER) |
03/21/2022 | Impact statement from DPB (HB632ER) |
03/21/2022 | Signed by President |
03/22/2022 | Signed by Speaker |
03/22/2022 | Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 22, 2022 |
03/22/2022 | G Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2022 |
04/11/2022 | G Approved by Governor-Chapter 490 (effective 7/1/22) |
04/11/2022 | G Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP0490) |
Comments
It’s great to see this bill out there, but how will it be enforced if “No law-enforcement officer shall stop a motor vehicle for a violation of this section”?
Cars modified to emit loud engine sounds are a plague in Fairfax county. There is no reason to have to listen to ridiculously loud cars in addition to other traffic noise. I applaud the House of Delegates for taking action to curb unnecessary vehicle noise, but I think stronger enforcement measures should be taken. Perhaps some kind of reporting hotline for citizens to report the tag numbers of overly loud cars? Then when the cars are inspected, these citizen reports can help flag cars for fines or some other enforcement mechanism.
These obnoxious exhausts really have become a serious nuisance in Fairfax, and so I'm very happy to hear that an effort is underway to change the law to make them illegal, as they should have been from the very beginning. Hoping this speeds through the approval process quickly.
Yes it should be illegal. They are annoying & disturbing our peace even on late nights where most people are sleeping
More of this please and stricter, stricter, stricter. Why should we have to deal with noise pollution just so some inconsiderate individual can feel macho with their ridiculous and useless exahust.
There are far, far more people who are annoyed and tormented by this problem than are openly vocal about it.
I have PTSD so I follow it more closely, but I have been tracking and reading sentiment on it for 7 years. It's not just local to Virginia, it's a car plague across the whole world with a subculture of mostly young male sociopaths who will do anything to both impress each other and to get attention of any sort, from strangers. It's heavily correlated to toxic male attitudes too--women largely don't participate in this, nor do most educated or considerate men.
Municipalities across the world are beginning to fight back with acoustic camera tech and bills/laws that will enforce a win/win between the safety/security/peace/freedom of the vast majority of citizens who want to live free of selfish noise pollution, as well as the state and the police, who can profit from automatically ticketing violators, just as we did with red light cameras years ago.
Looking forward to a version of the future where towns get more and better funding every single time some loud jerk drives through, same as with red light runners.